Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 28;20(12):83.
doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0951-z.

Radical Cystectomy in Female Patients - Improving Outcomes

Affiliations
Review

Radical Cystectomy in Female Patients - Improving Outcomes

Nikolaos Kalampokis et al. Curr Urol Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review the methods of improving surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes in women with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy.

Recent findings: Οrthotopic urinary diversion (ONB) is a safe option for well-selected women as it combines high rates of daytime and nighttime continence with exceptional oncologic outcomes. It is considered safe even for patients with limited lymph node disease and trigone involvement, as long as a preoperative biopsy of the bladder neck or an intraoperative frozen section analysis of distal urethral margin rules out malignant disease. Nerve-sparing techniques have shown promising results. For well-selected patients with early invasive disease, sparing of internal genitalia has proven to be oncologically safe. Yet, generally accepted and evidence-based oncological and functional follow-up schemes for women after radical cystectomy are still lacking. Properly designed prospective studies are needed with adequate number of participants in order to safely conclude about a broader use of pelvic organ-sparing cystectomy.

Keywords: Bladder cancer; Diversion; Outcomes; Radical cystectomy; Women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1585-8 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 2006 Nov 15;107(10):2368-74 - PubMed
    1. Urol Int. 2009;82(3):306-11 - PubMed
    1. World J Urol. 2011 Aug;29(4):451-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):913-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources