Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Nov 2;20(4):415-422.
doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2019.4499.

Human brucellosis in pregnancy - an overview

Affiliations
Review

Human brucellosis in pregnancy - an overview

Mile Bosilkovski et al. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. .

Abstract

Human brucellosis during pregnancy is characterized by significantly less pronounced adverse obstetric outcomes than in animals, but with remarkably more adverse obstetric outcomes when compared to healthy pregnant women. Seroprevalence of brucellosis in pregnancy and cumulative incidence of brucellosis cases per 1000 delivered obstetrical discharges in endemic regions were reported to be 1.5-12.2% and 0.42-3.3, respectively. Depending on the region, the frequency of pregnant women in the cohorts of patients with brucellosis was from 1.5% to 16.9%. The most common and the most dramatic unfavorable outcomes during brucellosis in pregnancy are the obstetric ones, manifested as abortions (2.5-54.5%), intrauterine fetal death (0-20.6%), or preterm deliveries (1.2-28.6%), depending on the stage of pregnancy. Other unfavorable outcomes due to brucellosis are addressed to infant (congenital/neonatal brucellosis, low birth weight, development delay, or even death), the clinical course of disease in mother, and delivery team exposure. When diagnosed in pregnant women, brucellosis should be treated as soon as possible. Early administration of adequate therapy significantly reduces the frequency of adverse outcomes. Rifampicin in combination with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for 6 weeks is the most commonly used and recommended regimen, although monotherapies with each of these two drugs are also widely used while waiting for the results from prospective randomized therapeutic trials. As no effective human vaccine exists, screening of pregnant women and education of all women of childbearing age about brucellosis should be compulsory preventive measures in endemic regions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interests

References

    1. Ariza J, Bosilkovski M, Cascio A, Colmenero JD, Corbel MJ, Falagas ME, et al. Perspectives for the treatment of brucellosis in the 21st century:The Ioannina recommendations. PLoS Med. 2007;4(12):e317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040317. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkovski M, Tsianos E. Brucellosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(22):2325–36. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra050570. - PubMed
    1. Bosilkovski M, Stojanov A, Stevanovic M, Karadzovski Z, Krstevski K. Impact of measures to control brucellosis on disease characteristics in humans:Experience from an endemic region in the Balkans. Infect Dis (Lond) 2018;50(5):340–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2017.1407037. - PubMed
    1. Bosilkovski M, Dimzova M, Cvetkova M, Poposki K, Spasovska K, Vidinic I. The changing pattern of fever of unknown origin in the Republic of North Macedonia. Rom J Intern Med. 2019;57(3):248–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2019-0007. - PubMed
    1. Bosilkovski M, Krteva L, Dimzova M, Kondova I. Brucellosis in 418 patients from the Balkan Peninsula:Exposure-related differences in clinical manifestations, laboratory test results, and therapy outcome. Int J Infect Dis. 2007;11(4):342–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2006.10.002. - PubMed

Substances