Thrombo-inflammatory prognostic score improves qSOFA for risk stratification in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 31782945
- DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2019-0864
Thrombo-inflammatory prognostic score improves qSOFA for risk stratification in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background Both the thrombo-inflammatory prognostic score (TIPS) and the quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) are quick prognostic scores for sepsis during the early phase, while either of two scores has limited prognostic value for sepsis patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether TIPS adds more information of sepsis risk stratification for qSOFA. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis in the emergency department (ED). We performed a receiver-operating characteristic curve, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision-curve analysis (DCA) analyses to investigate whether TIPS can improve qSOFA for risk prediction in patients with sepsis. The primary endpoint was mortality and the secondary endpoints were mechanical ventilation and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the 28-day follow-up. Results We identified 821 patients with sepsis. We randomly assigned the patients' data to a derivation group (n = 498; n = 112 died during the 28-days follow-up) or to a validation group (n = 323; n = 61). The addition of TIPS to qSOFA (T-qSOFA) improved the area under the curve (AUC) from 0.724 to 0.824 (p < 0.001) for predicting 28-day mortality. The discrimination improvement was confirmed by an IDI of 0.092 (p < 0.001). Addition of TIPS to the qSOFA resulted in a NRI of 0.247 (p < 0.001). The DCA showed that the net benefit of T-qSOFA was higher than that of TIPS or qSOFA for any threshold probabilities. Conclusions The prognostic value of qSOFA for patients with sepsis was enhanced by adding the TIPS score on admission for risk prediction in patients with sepsis during early phases in the ED.
Keywords: prognosis; quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA); risk stratification; sepsis; thrombo-inflammatory prognostic score (TIPS).
Similar articles
-
Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?Eur J Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):328-334. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460. Eur J Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 28338533 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328. JAMA. 2017. PMID: 28114553
-
Predictive performance of quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment for mortality and ICU admission in patients with infection at the ED.Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;34(9):1788-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.015. Epub 2016 Jun 7. Am J Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27321936
-
Comparison of qSOFA and Hospital Early Warning Scores for prognosis in suspected sepsis in emergency department patients: a systematic review.Emerg Med J. 2022 Apr;39(4):284-294. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210416. Epub 2021 Aug 17. Emerg Med J. 2022. PMID: 34404680
-
Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jul 11;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29996880 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Thrombo-inflammatory prognostic score can predict the outcome of stroke: a retrospective cohort study.Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 May 30;16:1391559. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1391559. eCollection 2024. Front Aging Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38872624 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a novel scoring system based on thrombosis and inflammation for predicting stroke-associated pneumonia: A retrospective cohort study.Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Mar 30;15:1153770. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1153770. eCollection 2023. Front Aging Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37065465 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). J Am Med Assoc 2016;315:801–10.
-
- Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis. Current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:259–72.
-
- Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. J Am Med Assoc 2014;311:1308–16.
-
- Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:304–77.
-
- Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). J Am Med Assoc 2016;315:762–74.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical