Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr:198:105557.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105557. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

1α, 25 Dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) inhibits the T cell suppressive function of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC)

Affiliations

1α, 25 Dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) inhibits the T cell suppressive function of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC)

J C Fleet et al. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) suppress the ability of cytotoxic T cells to attack and clear tumor cells from the body. The active form of vitamin D, 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), regulates myeloid cell biology and previous research showed that in mouse models 1,25(OH)2D reduced the tumor level of CD34+ cells, an MDSC precursor, and reduced metastasis. We tested whether MDSC are vitamin D target cells by examining granulocytic- (G-MDSC) and monocytic (M-MDSC) MDSC from tumors, spleen, and bone marrow. Vitamin D receptor (VDR) mRNA levels are low in MDSC from bone marrow and spleen but are 20-fold higher in tumor MDSC. At all sites, M-MDSC have 4-fold higher VDR mRNA expression than G-MDSC. Bone marrow MDSC were induced to differentiate in vitro into tumor MDSC-like cells by treating with IFN-γ, IL-13, and GM-CSF for 48 h. This treatment significantly elevated Arg1 and Nos2 levels, activated the T cell-suppressive function of MDSC, increased VDR expression 50-fold, and made the MDSC responsive to 1,25(OH)2D treatment. Importantly, 1,25(OH)2D treatment reduced the T cell suppressive capacity of cytokine-induced total MDSC and M-MDSC by ≥70 % and tumor-derived M-MDSC by 30-50 %. Consistent with this finding, VDR deletion (KO) increased T cell suppressive function of in vitro M-MDSC by 30 % and of tumor-derived M-MDSC by 50 % and G-MDSC by 400 %. VDR KO did not alter Nos2 mRNA levels but significantly increased Arg1 mRNA levels in tumor M-MDSC by 100 %. In contrast, 1,25(OH)2D treatment reduced nitric oxide production in both in vitro derived M- and G- MDSC. The major finding of this study is that 1,25(OH)2D signaling through the VDR decreases the immunosuppressive capability of MDSC. Collectively, our data suggest that activation of vitamin D signaling could be used to suppress MDSC function and release a constraint on T-cell mediated clearance of tumor cells.

Keywords: Cancer; Immunology; Myeloid derived suppressor cell; Vitamin D receptor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
VDR Expression is Elevated in Tumor MDSC Subtypes. RM-1 cells were injected ip into 12–14 wk old male C57BL/6 mice. After 7 d, MDSC subtypes were isolated from the tumor-containing ip space (Tumor), the spleen (SP), and bone marrow (BM) via flow cytometry-based cell sorting. VDR mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. n=3 (SP) to 8 (BM, Tumor) biological replicates comprised of pools from 4 to 5 mice each. Bars with different letter superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
In vitro Induction of MDSC Differentiation Stimulates VDR Expression and Makes MDSC Responsive to 1,25(OH)2D Treatment. Bone marrow MDSC (CD11b+Gr1+) were isolated from naïve male mice by FACS and then treated with a cocktail of 25 ng/ml IFNγ, 33 ng/ml IL-13, and 10 ug/ml GM-CSF for 48 h. (A) RNA was isolated from pre-culture (Pre) and post-culture (Post) cells then analyzed by qPCR for Arg1, Nos2 and VDR mRNA levels. * p < 0.05 vs pre-culture. (B) Bone Marrow MDSC were cultured with the three cytokines for 24 h and then treated for the last 24 h with cytokines combined with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D (1,25D) or ethanol vehicle (EtOH) prior to analysis of RNA by qPCR for two classical vitamin D target genes, VDR and Cyp24a1. * p < 0.05 vs preculture; #p < 0.05 vs EtOH vehicle.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Vitamin D Signaling Inhibits the Suppression of T cell Proliferation by in vitro Induced MDSC. Bone marrow from naïve mice was used to isolate total MDSC (CD11b+Gr1+) or M-MDSC (CD11b+Ly6ChiLy6Glo) and these cells were then treated with a cocktail of 25 ng/ml IFNγ, 33 ng/ml IL-13, and 10 ug/ml GM-CSF for 48 h. After 24 h of cytokine treatment, the cells were treated with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D or ethanol vehicle (EtOH) in the presence of cytokines for an additional 24 h. Afterwards, total MDSC (A) or M-MDSC (B) were isolated then co-cultured with activated OT-I splenocytes for 18 h. EdU was added for the last 1.5 h to assess T cell proliferation. Two different MDSC:OT-I ratios were used to assess the ability of MDSC to suppress T cell proliferation. (C) M-MDSC were isolated from bone marrow of naïve WT and VDR knockout (KO) Mice. Cells were co-cultured with OT-I splenocytes for 48 h. 24 h before harvest, ovalbumin peptide was added to activate splenocytes (SIINFKL to 1 ug/ml) and EdU was added for the last 1.5 h to assess T-cell proliferation. Differences between groups were determined on ArcSIN-transformed data by t-test (p < 0.05), n = 4 biological replicates of cells pooled from n = 3–5 mice. * p < 0.05 vs EtOH control at the same MDSC:OT-1 ratio.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
VDR Deletion (VDR KO) Enhances the Ability of Freshly Isolated tumor MDSC to Suppress T Cell Proliferation. RM-1 tumor cells were injected ip into wild-type (WT) and VDR KO mice and after 7 d, tumor MDSC were isolated from the ip space for use in an 18 h T cell proliferation suppression test using pre-activated OT-1 splenocytes. EdU was added for the last 1.5 h to assess T cell proliferation. (A) total tumor MDSC, (B) tumor M-MDSC, and (C) tumor G-MDSC were studied at three MDSC:OT-I cell ratios to capture the maximal suppressive effect on T cell proliferation (n = 3 independent biological replicates from pools of 3–5 mice) * p < 0.05 vs WT at a specific ratio.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Effects of VDR Deletion (KO) on Arg1 and Nos2 mRNA levels from Freshly Isolated Tumor MDSC. RM-1 tumor cells were injected ip into wild type (WT) and VDR KO mice. After 7 d, tumor MDSC subtypes were isolated from the ip space for RNA isolation and PCR analysis. (A) Arg1 mRNA and (B) Nos2 mRNA levels were assessed by qPCR (n = 4–6 biological replicates from pools of 3–5 mice). * p < 0.05 G vs M; # p < 0.05 WT vs VDR KO for a subtype within a tissue.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
1,25(OH)2D Treatment Reduces the Ability of Freshly Isolated Tumor M-MDSC to Suppress T Cell Proliferation. M-MDSC were isolated from the ip space of mice with RM-1 ip tumors by FACS. Cells were incubated with activated OT-I splenocytes for 18 h in a short-term T cell suppression test. EdU was added for the last 1.5 h to assess T cell proliferation. Different MDSC:OT-I ratios were used to capture the maximal suppressive effect on T cell proliferation. During this time, cells were co-treated with 10 nM 1,25(OH)2D or ethanol (EtOH) vehicle. (A) Percent suppression of T cell proliferation (n = 4 biological replicates of pooled samples from 3 to 5 mice per replicate). * p < 0.05 vs EtOH group; (B) A separate set of tumor G- or M-MDSC were cultured in the presence of absence of 1,25(OH)2D for 24 h at which point nitrite production was assessed with the Griess assay. (n = 3 biological replicates from pools of 3–5 mice). Paired t-tests were conducted on log10 transformed data. P values provided for comparisons.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ, Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion, Science 331 (2011) 1565–1570. - PubMed
    1. Ribas A, Wolchok JD, Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade, Science 359 (2018) 1350–1355. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindau D, Gielen P, Kroesen M, Wesseling P, Adema GJ, The immunosuppressive tumour network: myeloid-derived suppressor cells, regulatory T cells and natural killer T cells, Immunology 138 (2013) 105–115. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weber R, Fleming V, Hu X, Nagibin V, Groth C, Altevogt P, Utikal J, Umansky V, Myeloid-derived suppressor cells hinder the anti-cancer activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors, Front. Immunol 9 (2018) 1310. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Movahedi K, Guilliams M, Van den Bossche J, Van den Bergh R, Gysemans C, Beschin A, De BP, Van Ginderachter JA, Identification of discrete tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cell subpopulations with distinct T cell-suppressive activity, Blood 111 (2008) 4233–4244. - PubMed

Publication types