Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Oct;208(4):435-42.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198810000-00005.

Resurrection of the in situ saphenous vein bypass. 1000 cases later

Affiliations

Resurrection of the in situ saphenous vein bypass. 1000 cases later

R P Leather et al. Ann Surg. 1988 Oct.

Abstract

Distal bypasses for the terminal stages of atherosclerotic occlusive disease manifest by chronic limb-threatening ischemia are among the most challenging arterial reconstructive procedures of surgeons today. The length and low flow rates of distal bypasses often exceed the functional limits of synthetic and even free vein grafts. However, the saphenous vein, when used in situ, provides a unique, viable, physiologically active, and hence antithrombogenic endothelial flow surface that is ideally suited for such bypasses. This paper presents the experience of the Albany Medical Center Hospital with the first 1000 in situ bypasses performed by the valve incision method over a 12-year period. Limb-threatening ischemia was the most common indication for surgery (91%). An in situ bypass was attempted in over 95% of unselected limbs and were completed in situ and in toto in 94%. 66% of the bypasses were carried out to the infrapopliteal level, and in more than 50% of the limbs, the distal vein diameter was less than 3.5 mm. The 30-day patency rate was 95%, and the cumulative patency rates, by life table analysis at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, were 90%, 86%, 84%, 80%, and 76%, respectively. The vein diameter, specific outflow vessel, level of distal anastomosis (length of bypass), inguinal inflow source used, and instrumental evolution had no significant effect on immediate or long-term bypass performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1972 Dec;64(6):847-54 - PubMed
    1. Surg Annu. 1988;20:257-71 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1974 Dec;76(6):1031-40 - PubMed
    1. Surgery. 1979 Sep;86(3):453-61 - PubMed
    1. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Jun;79(6):911-5 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources