The magnitude and correlates of esophageal Varices among newly diagnosed cirrhotic patients undergoing screening fibre optic endoscope before incident bleeding in North-Western Tanzania; a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 31783802
- PMCID: PMC6884911
- DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1123-9
The magnitude and correlates of esophageal Varices among newly diagnosed cirrhotic patients undergoing screening fibre optic endoscope before incident bleeding in North-Western Tanzania; a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: Bleeding esophageal varices is a deadly complication of liver cirrhosis. Guidelines recommend an early diagnosis of esophageal varices before incident bleeding by screening all patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. Though it has been reported elsewhere that the presence of esophageal varices varies widely among cirrhotic patients this has not been assessed in Tanzania since endoscopy is not readily available for routine use in our setting. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of esophageal varices and assess the utility of clinical parameters in predicting the presence of varices among cirrhotic patients in northwestern Tanzania.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of adult patients with liver cirrhosis was done at Bugando Medical Centre. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and endoscopic data were collected and analyzed using STATA 13. The presence of esophageal varices was detected using endoscopic examination and associated factors were assessed by logistic regression. The predictive value of clinical predictors was also assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity.
Results: A total of 223 patients were enrolled, where 88 (39.5%; 95%CI: 33.0-45.9) had esophageal varices. The varices were independently associated with increased age (OR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.0-1.04; p = 0.030); increased splenic diameter (OR:1.3; 95%CI:1.2-1.5; p < 0.001), increased portal vein diameter (OR:1.2; 95%CI: 1.07-1.4; p = 0.003), having ascites (OR: 3.0; 95%CI: 1.01-8.7; p = 0.046), and advanced liver disease (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.3-6.7; p = 0.008). PSDR least performed in predicting varices, (AUC: 0.382; 95%CI: 0.304-0.459; cutoff: < 640; Sensitivity: 58.0%; 95%CI: 46.9-68.4; specificity: 57.0%; 95%CI: 48.2-65.5). SPD had better prediction; (AUC: 0.713; 95%CI: 0.646-0.781; cut off: > 15.2 cm; sensitivity: 65.9%; (95% CI: 55-75.7 and specificity:65.2%; 95%CI: 56.5-73.2), followed by PVD, (AUC: 0.6392; 95%CI: 0.566-0.712;cutoff: > 1.45 cm; sensitivity: 62.5%; 95CI: 51.5-72.6; specificity: 61.5%; 95%CI: 52.7-69.7).
Conclusion: Esophageal varices were prevalent among cirrhotic patients, most of which were at risk of bleeding. The non-invasive prediction of varices was not strong enough to replace endoscopic diagnosis. However, the predictors in this study can potentially assist in the selection of patients at high risk of having varices and prioritize them for endoscopic screening and appropriate management.
Keywords: Esophageal varices; Liver cirrhosis; Non-invasive predictors; Northwestern Tanzania.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests
Figures
Similar articles
-
Platelet count to splenic diameter ratio and other noninvasive markers as predictors of esophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;28(5):347-352. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.17090. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28776495
-
Schistosoma mansoni-related periportal fibrosis; can we use APRI and PSDR levels in the real-time selection of patients for targeted endoscopy in a resource-limited setting? A case-control study.BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 May 13;21(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01802-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33985430 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive predictors of esophageal varices.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jan-Feb;17(1):64-8. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.74470. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21196656 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients - Non-invasive methods.Ann Hepatol. 2019 Sep-Oct;18(5):673-678. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 28. Ann Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 31279653 Review.
-
Endoscopic screening for varices in cirrhosis: findings, implications, and outcomes.Gastroenterology. 2002 May;122(6):1620-30. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33419. Gastroenterology. 2002. PMID: 12016427 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictive value of platelet counts to detect grade of esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis.J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2330-2335. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1598_24. Epub 2025 Jun 30. J Family Med Prim Care. 2025. PMID: 40726666 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of non-invasive diagnosis of esophageal varices among cirrhotic patients in a low-income setting.Heliyon. 2023 Dec 3;9(12):e23229. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23229. eCollection 2023 Dec. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38149190 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnostic accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT in detecting esophageal varices.BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Aug 14;24(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01388-0. BMC Med Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39143502 Free PMC article.
-
Non-invasive predictors to grade esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis patients.J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Apr;13(4):1232-1237. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_792_23. Epub 2024 Apr 22. J Family Med Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 38827661 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical