Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 29;18(1):185.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1092-1.

Trends in horizontal inequity in access to public health care services by immigrant condition in Spain (2006-2017)

Jaime Pinilla  1 , Miguel A Negrín  1 , Ignacio Abásolo  2   3
Affiliations

Trends in horizontal inequity in access to public health care services by immigrant condition in Spain (2006-2017)

Jaime Pinilla et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: The objective of this research is to analyse trends in horizontal inequity in access to public health services by immigration condition in Spain throughout the period 2006-2017. We focus on "economic immigrants" because they are potentially the most vulnerable group amongst immigrants.

Methods: Based on the National Health Surveys of 2006-07 (N = 29,478), 2011-12 (N = 20,884) and 2016-17 (N = 22,903), hierarchical logistic regressions with random effects in Spain's autonomous communities are estimated to explain the probability of using publicly-financed health care services by immigrant condition, controlling by health care need and other socioeconomic and demographic variables.

Results: Our results indicate that there are several horizontal inequities, though they changed throughout the decade studied. Regarding primary care services, the period starts (2006-07) with no global evidence of horizontal inequity in access (although the analysis by continent shows inequity that is detrimental to Eastern Europeans and Asians), giving way to inequity favouring economic immigrants (particularly Latin Americans and Africans) in 2011-12 and 2016-17. An opposite trend happens with specialist care, as the period starts (2006-07) with evidence of inequity that is detrimental to economic immigrants (particularly those from North of Africa) but this inequity disappears with the economic crisis and after it (with the only exception of Eastern Europeans in 2011-12, whose probability to visit a specialist is lower than for natives). Regarding emergency care, our evidence indicates horizontal inequity in access that favours economic immigrants (particularly Latin Americans and North Africans) that remains throughout the period. In general, there is no inequity in hospitalisations, with the exception of 2011-12, where inequity in favour of economic immigrants (particularly those from Latin America) takes place.

Conclusions: The results obtained here may serve, firstly, to prevent alarm about negative discrimination of economic immigrants in their access to public health services, even after the implementation of the Royal Decree RD Law 16/2012. Conversely, our results suggest that the horizontal inequity in access to specialist care that was found to be detrimental to economic immigrants in 2006-07, disappeared in global terms in 2011-12 and also by continent of origin in 2016-17.

Keywords: Economic immigration; Horizontal equity in access; National health surveys; Public health care services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
General Practitioner by economic condition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
General Practitioner by continent of origin
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Specialist by economic condition
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Specialist by continent of origin
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Hospitalisations by economic condition
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Hospitalisations by continent of origin
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Emergencies by economic condition
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Emergencies by continent of origin
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Birch S, Eyles J, Newbold KB. Equitable access to health care: methodological extensions to the analysis of physician utilisation in Canada. Health Econ. 1993;2:87–101. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020203. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carrasco-Garrido P, Jiménez-García R, Barrera VH, López de Andrés A, Gil de Miguel A. Significant differences in the use of healthcare resources of native-born and foreign born in Spain. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(201):1–12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-201. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernández-Quevedo C, Jiménez-Rubio D. A comparison of the health status and health care utilization patterns between foreigners and the national population in Spain: new evidence from the Spanish national health survey. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:370–378. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Regidor E, Sanz B, Pascual C, Lostao L, Sánchez E, Díaz Olalla JM. La utilización de los servicios sanitarios por la población inmigrante en España. Gac Sanit. 2009;23:4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.01.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rivera B, Casal B, Currais L. Estado de salud y frecuentación de los servicios sanitarios de los menores hijos de inmigrantes. Gac Sanit. 2009;23:53–56. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.09.011. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types