Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 29;16(1):117.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0881-7.

Type of screen time moderates effects on outcomes in 4013 children: evidence from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children

Affiliations

Type of screen time moderates effects on outcomes in 4013 children: evidence from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children

Taren Sanders et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. .

Abstract

Background: Excessive engagement with digital screens is harmful to children's health. However, new evidence suggests that exposure at moderate levels may not be harmful and may even provide benefit. Therefore, our objective was to determine if there are curvilinear relationships between different types of screen time and a diverse set of outcomes, including health and education.

Methods: We address our objective using a repeated measures design. Children (N = 4013), initially aged 10-11 were assessed every 2 years between 2010 and 2014. Children's screen time behavior was measured using time-use diaries, and categorized into five types: social, passive, interactive, educational, or other. We used measures of children's physical health, health-related quality of life, socio-emotional outcomes, and school achievement. The analysis plan was pre-registered. Models were adjusted for gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity, number of siblings, and housing factors.

Results: There were linear associations between total screen time and all outcomes, such that more screen time was associated with worse outcomes. However, there was variability when examined by screen time type. Passive screen time (e.g., TV) was associated with worse outcomes, educational screen time (e.g., computer for homework) was associated with positive educational outcomes and had no negative relations with other outcomes. Interactive screen time (e.g., video games) had positive associations with educational outcomes but negative associations with other outcomes. In all instances, these significant associations were small or very small, with standardised effects < 0.07. We found little evidence of curvilinear relationships.

Conclusions: The small effects of screen time on children's outcomes appear to be moderated by the type of screen time. Policy makers, educators, and parents should consider the type of screen time when considering the benefits and harms of use.

Keywords: Children; Education; Health; Screen time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Density Plots for Components of Total Screen Time
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adjusted Standardised Linear Effects for Each Combination of Screen Time Exposure and Outcome

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Saunders TJ, Vallance JK. Screen time and health indicators among children and youth: Current evidence, limitations and future directions. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15:323–331. doi: 10.1007/s40258-016-0289-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Council on Communications and Media. Media use in school-aged children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2016;138. Available from: 10.1542/peds.2016-2592. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health. Australia’s Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines: Department of Health; 2014. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/content/health-pub... Accessed 10 May 2019
    1. Liu Mingli, Wu Lang, Yao Shuqiao. Dose–response association of screen time-based sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents and depression: a meta-analysis of observational studies. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;50(20):1252–1258. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095084. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tremblay Mark S, LeBlanc Allana G, Kho Michelle E, Saunders Travis J, Larouche Richard, Colley Rachel C, Goldfield Gary, Gorber Sarah. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011;8(1):98. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-98. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources