Overcoming Regulatory Aversion to Novel Methods of Evidence Generation
- PMID: 31785161
- PMCID: PMC7232859
- DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1711
Overcoming Regulatory Aversion to Novel Methods of Evidence Generation
Conflict of interest statement
Drs. Baumfeld Andre and Honig are employees of Pfizer and any opinions expressed here are their own and do not represent the views of Pfizer, Inc. As an Associate Editor for
Comment on
-
Are Novel, Nonrandomized Analytic Methods Fit for Decision Making? The Need for Prospective, Controlled, and Transparent Validation.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Apr;107(4):773-779. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1638. Epub 2019 Oct 1. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020. PMID: 31574163 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hutt, P.B. The evolution of federal regulation of human drugs in the United States: an historical essay. Am. J. Law 44, 403–445 (2018). - PubMed
-
- Honig, P. & Zhang, L. Regulation and innovation: role of regulatory science in facilitating pharmaceutical innovation. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 105, 778–781 (2019). - PubMed
-
- Prescription Drug User Fee Act ( PDUFA ) .VI: fiscal year 2018–2022 <https://www.fda.gov/media/99140/download>. Accessed September 23, 2019.
-
- Blincyto ™ ( blinatumomab ) . Approval Letter and FDA Review Documents <https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2016/125557Orig1s005T...>. Accessed September 23, 2019.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
