Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Feb;27(2):441-451.e2.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.791. Epub 2019 Nov 27.

Recurrence after Surgery for Colorectal Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Recurrence after Surgery for Colorectal Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Sofiane Bendifallah et al. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: The recurrence rate after colorectal surgery for endometriosis is up to 50% at 5 years. The aim of the current review and meta-analysis was to assess recurrence associated with shaving, disc excision, and segmental resection for endometriosis with colorectal involvement.

Data sources: A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications before February 28, 2019, using the terms "colorectal endometriosis" and "recurrence" in English. The outcome measure was histologically proven recurrence 1 year after the index surgery.

Methods of study selection: Studies rated as good or fair by a study quality assessment tool were included. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the studies; discrepancies were discussed, and if a consensus was not reached, a third reviewer was consulted.

Tabulation, integration, and results: Of 156 relevant published trials, 41 were systematically reviewed and 4 were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of recurrence was higher after rectal shaving than after both segmental resection (odds ratio [OR], 5.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-13.12; I2 = 0%; p = .001) and disc excision for histologically proven recurrence (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.33-11.05; I2 = 0%; p = .01). This difference was not significant when comparing disc excision with segmental resection (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 0.8-8.65; I2 = 0%; p = .11).

Conclusion: The current analysis shows that the risk of recurrence is lower when segmental resection or disc excision is performed than when rectal shaving is performed. This finding is important when deciding the most appropriate surgical management.

Keywords: Disc excision; Reappearance; Segmental resection; Shaving.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms