Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;129(5):421-427.
doi: 10.1177/0003489419892997. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

Efficacy of Multi-Modal Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy on Hyperacusis Patients

Affiliations

Efficacy of Multi-Modal Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy on Hyperacusis Patients

Mehdi Abouzari et al. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of a multi-modal migraine prophylaxis therapy for patients with hyperacusis.

Methods: In a prospective cohort, patients with hyperacusis were treated with a multi-modal step-wise migraine prophylactic regimen (nortriptyline, verapamil, topiramate, or a combination thereof) as well as lifestyle and dietary modifications. Pre- and post-treatment average loudness discomfort level (LDL), hyperacusis discomfort level measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS), and scores on the modified Khalfa questionnaire for severity of hyperacusis were compared.

Results: Twenty-two of the 25 patients (88%) reported subjective resolution of their symptoms following treatment. Post-treatment audiograms showed significant improvement in average LDL from 81.3 ± 3.2 dB to 86.4 ± 2.6 dB (P < .001), indicating increased sound tolerability. The VAS discomfort level also showed significant improvement from a pre-treatment average of 7.7 ± 1.1 to 3.7 ± 1.6 post-treatment (P < .001). There was also significant improvement in the average total score on modified Khalfa questionnaire (32.2 ± 3.6 vs 22.0 ± 5.7, P < .001).

Conclusions: The majority of patients with hyperacusis demonstrated symptomatic improvement from migraine prophylaxis therapy, as indicated by self-reported and audiometric measures. Our findings indicate that, for some patients, hyperacusis may share a pathophysiologic basis with migraine disorder and may be successfully managed with multimodal migraine prophylaxis therapy.

Keywords: hyperacusis; migraine; migraine treatment; modified Khalfa questionnaire; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Algorithm for step-wise migraine prophylactic regimen.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pre- and post-treatment average scores on different domains of modified Khalfa questionnaire.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baguley DM, Hoare DJ. Hyperacusis: major research questions. HNO. 2018;66(5):358–363. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosing SN, Schmidt JH, Wedderkopp N, Baguley DM. Prevalence of tinnitus and hyperacusis in children and adolescents: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(6):e010596. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tyler RS, Pienkowski M, Roncancio ER, et al. A review of hyperacusis and future directions: part I. Definitions and manifestations. Am J Audiol. 2014;23(4):402–419. - PubMed
    1. Paulin J, Andersson L, Nordin S. Characteristics of hyperacusis in the general population. Noise Health. 2016;18(83):178–184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Juris L, Andersson G, Larsen HC, Ekselius L. Psychiatric comorbidity and personality traits in patients with hyperacusis. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(4):230–235. - PubMed

MeSH terms