Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Mar;27(4):367-377.
doi: 10.1177/2047487319892201. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

Home-based exercise with telemonitoring guidance in patients with coronary artery disease: Does it improve long-term physical fitness?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Home-based exercise with telemonitoring guidance in patients with coronary artery disease: Does it improve long-term physical fitness?

Andrea Avila et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Home-based interventions might facilitate the lifelong uptake of a physically active lifestyle following completion of a supervised phase II exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. Yet, data on the long-term effectiveness of home-based exercise training on physical activity and exercise capacity are scarce.

Objective: The purpose of the TeleRehabilitation in Coronary Heart disease (TRiCH) study was to compare the long-term effects of a short home-based phase III exercise programme with telemonitoring guidance to a prolonged centre-based phase III programme in coronary artery disease patients. The primary outcome was exercise capacity. Secondary outcomes included physical activity behaviour, cardiovascular risk profile and health-related quality of life.

Methods: Ninety coronary artery disease patients (80 men) were randomly assigned to 3 months of home-based (30), centre-based (30) or a control group (30) on a 1:1:1 basis after completion of their phase II ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation programme. Outcome measures were assessed at discharge of the phase II programme and after one year.

Results: Eighty patients (72 (91%) men; mean age 62.6 years) completed the one-year follow-up measurements. Exercise capacity and secondary outcomes were preserved in all three groups (Ptime > 0.05 for all), irrespective of the intervention (Pinteraction > 0.05 for all). Eighty-five per cent of patients met the international guidelines for physical activity (Ptime < 0.05). No interaction effect was found for physical activity.

Conclusion: Overall, exercise capacity remained stable during one year following phase II cardiac rehabilitation. Our home-based exercise intervention was as effective as centre-based and did not result in higher levels of exercise capacity and physical activity compared to the other two interventions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047942. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02047942.

Keywords: Cardiac rehabilitation; coronary artery disease; exercise; telemonitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

Associated data