Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 2;76(24):2028-2040.
doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz236.

Effect of medication reconciliation interventions on outcomes: A systematic overview of systematic reviews

Collaborators, Affiliations

Effect of medication reconciliation interventions on outcomes: A systematic overview of systematic reviews

Laura J Anderson et al. Am J Health Syst Pharm. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and summarize published evidence from systematic reviews examining medication reconciliation.

Methods: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects were searched for English-language systematic reviews published from January 2004 to March 2019. Reviewers independently extracted information and scored review quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool. For reviews with AMSTAR scores above 7, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to assess evidence quality, with evidence summarized and conclusions compared across reviews.

Results: Eleven reviews met the inclusion criteria, 5 of which used meta-analytic pooling. Most systematic reviews included primary studies of comprehensive bundled interventions that featured medication reconciliation as a central component. Reviews largely focused on transitions into and out of hospital settings. Five reviews focused exclusively on pharmacist-led interventions. Of the 5 reviews that considered all types of medication discrepancies, 3 reviews found very low-quality evidence that interventions reduced medication discrepancies. Neither of the 2 reviews that examined clinically significant medication discrepancies found any intervention effect. Of the 5 reviews that examined healthcare utilization outcomes, only 1 found any intervention effect, and that finding was based on low- to very low-quality evidence. Four reviews considered clinical outcomes, but none found any intervention effect.

Conclusion: An overview of systematic reviews of medication reconciliation interventions found 9 high-quality systematic reviews. A minority of those reviews' conclusions were consistent with medication reconciliation alone having a measurable impact, and such conclusions were almost all based on very low-quality evidence.

Keywords: intervention; medication errors; medication reconciliation; medication review; review; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram of publication selection for inclusion in overview.

Comment in

References

    1. Varkey P, Cunningham J, Bisping DS. Improving medication reconciliation in the outpatient setting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007; 33(5):286-92. - PubMed
    1. Tam VC, Knowles SR, Cornish PL et al. . Frequency, type and clinical importance of medication history errors at admission to hospital: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2005; 173(5):510-5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cornish PL, Knowles SR, Marchesano R et al. . Unintended medication discrepancies at the time of hospital admission. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165(4):424-9. - PubMed
    1. Armor BL, Wight AJ, Carter SM. Evaluation of adverse drug events and medication discrepancies in transitions of care between hospital discharge and primary care follow-up. J Pharm Pract. 2016; 29(2):132-7. - PubMed
    1. Coleman EA, Smith JD, Raha D, Min SJ. Posthospital medication discrepancies: prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165(16):1842-7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms