Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 1:147:104-111.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Nov 29.

Electrocardiogram-based pulse prediction during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Affiliations

Electrocardiogram-based pulse prediction during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Heemun Kwok et al. Resuscitation. .

Abstract

Objective: Resuscitation requires CPR interruptions every 2 min to assess rhythm and pulse status. We developed a method to predict real-time pulse status in organized rhythm ECG segments with and without CPR artifact.

Methods: The study cohort included patients who received attempted resuscitation following ventricular fibrillation arrest. Using audio-supplemented defibrillator recordings, we annotated CPR, rhythm, and pulse status at each two-minute rhythm/pulse check. Paired ECG segments with and without CPR were extracted at each rhythm/pulse check. Using one-third of cases for training and two-thirds for validation, we developed three wavelet-based ECG features and combined them with a logistic model to predict pulse status. Predictive performances of each individual ECG feature and the combined logistic model were measured by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) in the validation cases with and without CPR.

Results: There were 238 cases and 911 ECG segment pairs. Among 319 organized rhythm segments in the validation set, AUC for pulse prediction during CPR ranged from 0.67 to 0.79 for the individual ECG features. The logistic model was more predictive than any individual feature (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.80-0.89, p < 0.05 for each comparison) and performed similarly regardless of CPR (p = 0.2 for difference).

Conclusion: ECG features extracted by wavelet analysis predicted pulse status with moderate accuracy among organized rhythm segments with and without CPR. Further study is required to understand how real-time pulse prediction during CPR could help direct care while limiting CPR interruption.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Pulseless electrical activity; Resuscitation; Ventricular fibrillation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Cardiac arrest without pulse checks.
    Clare D, Botta J. Clare D, et al. Resuscitation. 2020 Feb 1;147:112-113. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.023. Epub 2020 Jan 8. Resuscitation. 2020. PMID: 31926261 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources