Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct-Dec;4 (NS)(4):265-273.
doi: 10.20529/IJME.2019.062.

Affirmative action, minorities, and public services in India: Charting a future research and practice agenda

Affiliations

Affirmative action, minorities, and public services in India: Charting a future research and practice agenda

Upendra Bhojani et al. Indian J Med Ethics. 2019 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

The National Health Policy in India mentions equity as a key policy principle and emphasises the role of affirmative action in achieving health equity for a range of excluded groups. We conducted a scoping review of literature and three multi-stakeholder workshops to better understand the available evidence on the impact of affirmative action policies in enhancing the inclusion of ethnic and religious minorities in health, education and governance in India. We consider these public services an important mechanism to enhance the social inclusion of many excluded groups. On the whole, the available empirical evidence regarding the uptake and impact of affirmative action policies is limited. Reservation policies in higher education and electoral constituencies have had a limited positive impact in enhancing the access and representation of minorities. However, reservations in government jobs remain poorly implemented. In general, class, gender and location intersect, creating inter- and intra-group differentials in the impact of these policies. Several government initiatives aimed at enhancing the access of religious minorities to public services/institutions remain poorly evaluated. Future research and practice need to focus on neglected but relevant research themes such as the role of private sector providers in supporting the inclusion of minorities, the political aspects of policy development and implementation, and the role of social mobilisation and movements. Evidence gaps also need to be filled in relation to information systems for monitoring and assessment of social disadvantage, implementation and evaluative research on inclusive policies and understanding how the pathways to inequities can be effectively addressed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Statement of competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Literature search strategy and outcomes

References

    1. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. [cited 2019 Feb 14]. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43943/9789241563703_eng....
    1. Wilkinson R, Marmot M. Social Determinants of health: the solid facts. 2nd ed. World Health Organization; 2003. [cited 2019 Feb 14]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_file/0005/98438/e81384.pdf.
    1. Graham H. Social determinants and their unequal distribution: clarifying policy understandings. Milbank Q. 2004;82(1):101–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solar O, Irwin A. Social Determinants of Health Discussion Paper 2 (Policy and Practice) Geneva: 2010. [cited 2019 Feb 14]. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. Available from: https://www.who.int/sdhconference/resources/Conceptualframeworkforaction....
    1. Burns P, Schapper J. The ethical case for affirmative action. J Bus Ethics. 2008;83:369–79.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources