Acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk surgical patients: is percutaneous cholecystostomy preferable to emergency cholecystectomy?
- PMID: 31792903
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04424-5
Acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk surgical patients: is percutaneous cholecystostomy preferable to emergency cholecystectomy?
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) has better results than emergency cholecystectomy (EC) in elderly and high-risk surgical patients.
Methods: Patients ≥ 70 years and/or ≥ ASA-PS 3 with ACC treated with PC or EC between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Both techniques were compared regarding morbi-mortality, hospital stay, complications and readmissions. A subgroup analysis in higher risk patients (≥ 70 years plus ≥ ASA-PS 3) was also performed. A binary logistic regression analysis for outcome variables to calculate the OR was carried out.
Results: A total of 461 patients were included in the study. The results of PC were worse compared to EC: 30-day mortality (8.6 vs. 1.7%, OR 18.4), 90-day mortality (10.4 vs. 2.1%, OR 10.3), length of stay (days) (13.21 ± 8.2 vs. 7.48 ± 7.67, OR 8.7) and readmission rate (35.1 vs. 12.6%, OR 4.7). Complications were lower for PC (14 vs. 22.6%, OR 0.41), but there were no significant differences in the number of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III). Higher-risk subgroup analysis (n = 193; PC = 128, EC = 65) showed similar results to the whole series. Patients with ACC for more than 3 days had more risk of severe complications in both groups (OR 2.26; OR 2.76).
Conclusion: PC was associated with an increased risk of mortality at 30 and 90 days, more readmissions and longer hospital stay. Although PC presents a lower risk of complications, the percentage of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) does not show significant differences.
Keywords: Cholecystectomy; Cholecystitis, acute; Cholecystostomy.
References
-
- Gomes CA, Junior CS, Di Saverio S et al (2017) Acute calculous cholecystitis: Review of current best practices. World J Gastrointest Surg 9:118-26. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v9.i5.118 . - DOI
-
- Kimura Y, Takada T, Kawarada Y et al (2007) Definitions, pathophysiology, and epidemiology of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14:15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1152-y - DOI
-
- Ansaloni L, Pisano M, Coccolini F et al (2016) 2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis. World J Emerg Surg 11:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-016-0082-5 . - DOI
-
- Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T et al (2017) Tokyo Guidelines 2018 flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.516 .
-
- Gurusamy KS, Rossi M, Davidson BR. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk surgical patients with acute calculous cholecystitis (2013) In: Gurusamy KS, editor. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev 8:CD007088.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
