Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Mar;188(6):898-906.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.16264. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

First-line R-CVP versus R-CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

First-line R-CVP versus R-CHOP induction immunochemotherapy for indolent lymphoma with rituximab maintenance. A multicentre, phase III randomized study by the Polish Lymphoma Research Group PLRG4

Jan Walewski et al. Br J Haematol. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

R-CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) and R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone + rituximab) are immunochemotherapy regimens frequently used for remission induction of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs). Rituximab maintenance (RM) significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with complete/partial remission (CR/PR). Here we report the final results of a randomized study comparing R-CVP to R-CHOP both followed by RM. Untreated patients in need of systemic therapy with symptomatic and progressive iNHLs including follicular (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), small lymphocytic (SLL), and lymphoplasmacytic (LPL) lymphoma were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive R-CVP or R-CHOP for eight cycles or until complete response (CR). All patients with CR/PR (partial response) received RM 375 mg/m2 q 2 months for 12 cycles. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Two-hundred and fifty patients [FL 42%, MZL/MALT 38%, LPL/ Waldenström Macroglobulinaemia (WM) 11%, SLL 9%] were enrolled and randomized (R-CHOP: 127, R-CVP: 123). Median age was 56 years (21-85), 44% were male, 90% were in stage III-IV, 43% of FL patients had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score ≥3, and 33·4% of all patients had an IPI score ≥3. At the end of induction treatment, the CR/PR rate was 43·6/50·9% and 36·3/60·8% in the R-CHOP and R-CVP groups (P = 0·218) respectively. After a median follow-up of 67, 66, and 70 months, five-year EFS was 61% vs. 56% (not significant), progression-free survival (PFS) was 71% vs. 69% (not significant) and overall survival (OS) was 84% vs. 89% in the R-CHOP vs. the R-CVP arm respectively. Grade III/IV adverse events (65 vs. 22) occurred in 40 (33·1%) and 18 (15·3%) patients, P = 0·001; neutropenia in 16 (11·6%) and 4 (3·4%) patients, P = 0·017; infection in 14 (10·7%) and 3 (2·5%) patients,; P = 0·011; and a second neoplasm in three versus seven patients., in the R-CHOP and the R-CVP groups respectively. This multicentre randomized study with >five-year follow-up shows similar outcome in patients with indolent lymphoma in need of systemic therapy treated with R-CVP or R-CHOP immunochemotherapy and rituximab maintenance in both arms. The minor toxicity of the R-CVP regimen makes it a reasonable choice for induction treatment, leaving other active agents like doxorubicin or bendamustin for second-line therapy.

Keywords: first-line induction immunochemotherapy; indolent lymphoma; rituximab maintenance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JW — Advisory role: Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen‐Cilag, Servier, Amgen, BMS, Abbvie, Novartis, Gilead; research funding: Roche, GSK/Novartis, Takeda, Janssen‐Cilag; lecture honoraria: Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen‐Cilag, Servier; Amgen; conference travel support: Roche. EPK — lecture honoraria: Roche, Takeda, Servier; conference travel support: Roche, Takeda, Celgene. GR — conference travel support: Roche, Takeda, Servier. TS — conference travel support: Roche. JMZ — lecture honoraria, conference travel support, research funding: Roche; advisory role: Takeda, Abbvie; lecture honoraria: Janssen‐Cilag. EKW — lecture honoraria: Roche; conference travel support: Roche. JRJ — lecture honoraria: Roche; conference travel support: Roche. ADI — conference travel support: Roche, Sanofi, Amgen. AD — advisory role: Roche, Celgene, Amgen; lecture honoraria: Roche, Celgene, Amgen, GSK/Novartis, Servier. WJ — research funding: Roche, Celtrion, Sandoz Novartis, Janssen, Acerta, Merck, Beigene, TG therapeutics, Gilead, Celgene; advisory role: Sandoz Novartis, Janssen, Acerta, Abbvie, Servier. WM, AB, AG, AW, DZC, WKP, AT, BG, MJJ, AB, WH, AP, AR, AH, BSH — none declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment allocation and patients included in the analysis. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary endpoint Event Free Survival in total study population (P = 0.386) (A) and by histology subtype (P < 0.001) (B). [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Progression Free Survival (P = 0.849).

References

    1. Bachy, E. , Houot, R. , Morschhauser, F. , Sonet, A. , Brice, P. , Belhadj, K. , Cartron, G. , Audhuy, B. , Ferme, C. , Feugier, P. , Sebban, C. , Delwail, V. , Maisonneuve, H. , Le Gouill, S. , Lefort, S. , Brousse, N. , Foussard, C. & Salles, G. (2013) Long‐term follow up of the FL2000 study comparing CHVP‐interferon to CHVP‐interferon plus rituximab in follicular lymphoma. Haematologica, 98, 1107–1114. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Casulo, C. , Nastoupil, L. , Fowler, N.H , Friedberg, J.W & Flowers, C.R (2017) Unmet needs in the first‐line treatment of follicular lymphoma. Annals of Oncology, 28, 2094–2106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheson, B.D. , Horning, S.J. , Coiffier, B. , Shipp, M.A. , Fisher, R.I. , Connors, J.M. , Lister, T.A. , Vose, J. , Grillo‐López, A. , Hagenbeek, A. & Cabanillas, F. (1999) Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 17, 1244. - PubMed
    1. Cheson, B.D. , Pfistner, B. , Juweid, M.E. , Gascoyne, R.D. , Specht, L. , Horning, S.J. , Coiffier, B. , Fisher, R.I. , Hagenbeek, A. , Zucca, E. & Rosen, S.T. (2007) Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25, 579–586. - PubMed
    1. Federico, M. , Luminari, S. , Dondi, A. , Tucci, A. , Vitolo, U. , Rigacci, L. , Di Raimondo, F. , Carella, A.M. , Pulsoni, A. , Merli, F. & Arcaini, L. (2013) R‐CVP versus R‐CHOP versus R‐FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced‐stage follicular lymphoma: results of the FOLL05 trial conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31, 1506–13. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms