Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jan;61(1):115-124.
doi: 10.1111/epi.16402. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

External validation and comparison of two prediction models for seizure recurrence after the withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in adult patients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

External validation and comparison of two prediction models for seizure recurrence after the withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in adult patients

Jiahe Lin et al. Epilepsia. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The models currently available for predicting the risk of seizure recurrence after antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal in adult epilepsy patients include the prediction model developed by Lamberink et al (Lamberink model, 2017) and the Medical Research Council prediction model (MRC model, 1993). However, there was no external validation for the two models. The purpose of this study was to perform an independent external validation and a comparison of the Lamberink model and the MRC model in adult patients.

Methods: The study population was recruited from the Wenzhou Epilepsy Follow-up Registry Database (WEFURD). All the predictors of the Lamberink and MRC models and the occurrence of seizure recurrence in the participants were collected based on the WEFURD. Participants' predicted probabilities of seizure recurrence were obtained by a Web-based tool and the prognostic index formula. The external validation of the Lamberink model and the MRC model were quantified by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: Of 212 patients, 126 (59.4%) had seizure recurrence after AED withdrawal. The Lamberink 2-year model, the Lamberink 5-year model, the MRC 1-year model, and the MRC 2-year model had areas under the curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64-0.78), 0.68 (95% CI = 0.60-0.76), 0.60 (95% CI = 0.50-0.69), and 0.58 (95% CI = 0.50-0.66), respectively. Additionally, the Lamberink 2-year model had a significantly better integrated discrimination improvement than the MRC 2-year model (P < .001). Regarding calibration, the Lamberink 2-year model (P = .121) and the MRC 1-year model (P = .264) were well calibrated, but the Lamberink 5-year model (P = .022) and the MRC 2-year model (P = .008) were not. In the DCA, the Lamberink 2-year model performed well at threshold probabilities of 30%-65%.

Significance: This external validation shows that the Lamberink 2-year model might be more accurate and has greater clinical benefit than others for guiding drug withdrawal in adult epilepsy clinics.

Keywords: adult epilepsy; drug withdrawal; external validation; prediction model; seizure recurrence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Shorvon SD, Goodridge DM. Longitudinal cohort studies of the prognosis of epilepsy: contribution of the National General Practice Study of Epilepsy and other studies. Brain. 2013;136:3497-510.
    1. Du Y, Lin J, Shen J, et al. Adverse drug reactions associated with six commonly used antiepileptic drugs in southern China from 2003 to 2015. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;20:7.
    1. Perucca P, Carter J, Vahle V, Gilliam FG. Adverse antiepileptic drug effects: toward a clinically and neurobiologically relevant taxonomy. Neurology. 2009;72:1223-9.
    1. Li L, Li J, Wu X, Zhu Y, Lei D. Considering economic reality in calculating the financial burden of epilepsy in China. Epilepsia. 2011;52:416-8.
    1. Wibecan L, Fink G, Tshering L, et al. The economic burden of epilepsy in Bhutan. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23:342-58.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources