Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun;65(3-4):353-368.
doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12404. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

Homeless Adults' Recovery Experiences in Housing First and Traditional Services Programs in Seven European Countries

Collaborators, Affiliations

Homeless Adults' Recovery Experiences in Housing First and Traditional Services Programs in Seven European Countries

Ronni Michelle Greenwood et al. Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Across Europe, as governments turn to housing-led strategies in attempts to reverse rising rates of homelessness, increasing numbers of Housing First (HF) programs are being implemented. As HF programs become more widespread, it is important to understand how service users experience them compared to the more prevalent traditional treatment-first approach to addressing long-term homelessness. Although there is a large body of research on service users' experiences of Housing First compared to treatment-first in North American contexts, comparatively less is known about how these two categories of homeless services are experienced in the European context. In a correlational and cross-sectional study, part of a larger examination of homelessness in Europe, participants (n = 520) engaged with either HF (n = 245) or traditional services (TS; n = 275) programs in seven countries completed measures of their experiences of services (consumer choice, housing quality, and service satisfaction) and recovery (time in independent housing, psychiatric symptoms, and community integration). Across the seven countries, participants engaged with HF programs reported experiencing more consumer choice, better perceived housing quality, and more satisfaction with services than participants engaged in TS programs. Participants in HF programs also reported a greater proportion of time in independent accommodation, fewer psychiatric symptoms, and more community integration. Varying patterns of association between experiences of services and recovery outcomes were observed. Findings indicate HF consistently predicts greater recovery than TS across diverse sociopolitical and economic contexts. Implications of findings for configurations of homeless services and homeless services policy are discussed.

Keywords: Choice; Homelessness; Housing First; Housing quality; Recovery; Satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adair, C. E., Kopp, B., Distasio, J., Hwang, S. W., Lavoie, J., Veldhuizen, S., … & Cote, S. (2016). Housing quality in a randomized controlled trial of Housing First for homeless individuals with mental illness: Correlates and associations with outcomes. Journal of Urban Health, 93, 682-697.
    1. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    1. Anthony, W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16, 11-23.
    1. Atherton, I., & Nicholls, C. M. (2008). ‘Housing First’ as a means of addressing multiple needs and homelessness. European Journal of Homelessness, 2, 289-303.
    1. Aubry, T., Bernad, R., & Greenwood, R. M. (2018). A multi-country study of the fidelity of Housing First programmes: Introduction. European Journal of Homelessness, 12, 15-31.

Publication types