American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia
- PMID: 31794604
- PMCID: PMC6963252
- DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000966
American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia
Erratum in
-
Neunert C, Terrell DR, Arnold DM, et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 2019;3(23):3829-3866.Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 28;4(2):252. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001380. Blood Adv. 2020. PMID: 31945156 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Despite an increase in the number of therapies available to treat patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), there are minimal data from randomized trials to assist physicians with the management of patients.
Objective: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about the management of ITP.
Methods: In 2015, ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 8 adult clinical experts, 5 pediatric clinical experts, 2 methodologists with expertise in ITP, and 2 patient representatives. The panel was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The panel reviewed the ASH 2011 guideline recommendations and prioritized questions. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including evidence-to-decision frameworks, to appraise evidence (up to May 2017) and formulate recommendations.
Results: The panel agreed on 21 recommendations covering management of ITP in adults and children with newly diagnosed, persistent, and chronic disease refractory to first-line therapy who have non-life-threatening bleeding. Management approaches included: observation, corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin, anti-D immunoglobulin, rituximab, splenectomy, and thrombopoietin receptor agonists.
Conclusions: There was a lack of evidence to support strong recommendations for various management approaches. In general, strategies that avoided medication side effects were favored. A large focus was placed on shared decision-making, especially with regard to second-line therapy. Future research should apply standard corticosteroid-dosing regimens, report patient-reported outcomes, and include cost-analysis evaluations.
© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: All authors were members of the guideline panel or members of the systematic review team or both. As such, they completed disclosure-of-interest forms, which were reviewed by ASH and are available as supplemental Files 2 and 3.
Figures

Comment in
-
Positivity rate of systematic bone marrow smear in patients over 60 years old with newly diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia.Blood Adv. 2020 May 26;4(10):2136-2138. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001654. Blood Adv. 2020. PMID: 32421809 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Risk factors and current management of venous thromboembolism in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenic purpura.Eur J Intern Med. 2021 Apr;86:121-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.01.026. Epub 2021 Feb 7. Eur J Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 33568328 No abstract available.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
-
- Qaseem A, Forland F, Macbeth F, Ollenschläger G, Phillips S, van der Wees P; Board of Trustees of the Guidelines International Network. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):525-531. - PubMed
-
- Schünemann HJ, Al-Ansary LA, Forland F, et al. ; Board of Trustees of the Guidelines International Network. Guidelines International Network: principles for disclosure of interests and management of conflicts in guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(7):548-553. - PubMed
-
- Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, et al. ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016;353:i2089. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous