Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-2094.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17913.

Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer: The SCORAD Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer: The SCORAD Randomized Clinical Trial

Peter J Hoskin et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Malignant spinal canal compression, a major complication of metastatic cancer, is managed with radiotherapy to maintain mobility and relieve pain, although there is no standard radiotherapy regimen.

Objective: To evaluate whether single-fraction radiotherapy is noninferior to 5 fractions of radiotherapy.

Design, setting, and participants: Multicenter noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted in 42 UK and 5 Australian radiotherapy centers. Eligible patients (n = 686) had metastatic cancer with spinal cord or cauda equina compression, life expectancy greater than 8 weeks, and no previous radiotherapy to the same area. Patients were recruited between February 2008 and April 2016, with final follow-up in September 2017.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive external beam single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy (n = 345) or 20 Gy of radiotherapy in 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days (n = 341).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was ambulatory status at week 8, based on a 4-point scale and classified as grade 1 (ambulatory without the use of aids and grade 5 of 5 muscle power) or grade 2 (ambulatory using aids or grade 4 of 5 muscle power). The noninferiority margin for the difference in ambulatory status was -11%. Secondary end points included ambulatory status at weeks 1, 4, and 12 and overall survival.

Results: Among 686 randomized patients (median [interquartile range] age, 70 [64-77] years; 503 (73%) men; 44% had prostate cancer, 19% had lung cancer, and 12% had breast cancer), 342 (49.8%) were analyzed for the primary end point (255 patients died before the 8-week assessment). Ambulatory status grade 1 or 2 at week 8 was achieved by 115 of 166 (69.3%) patients in the single-fraction group vs 128 of 176 (72.7%) in the multifraction group (difference, -3.5% [1-sided 95% CI, -11.5% to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .06). The difference in ambulatory status grade 1 or 2 in the single-fraction vs multifraction group was -0.4% (63.9% vs 64.3%; [1-sided 95% CI, -6.9 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .004) at week 1, -0.7% (66.8% vs 67.6%; [1-sided 95% CI, -8.1 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .01) at week 4, and 4.1% (71.8% vs 67.7%; [1-sided 95% CI, -4.6 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .002) at week 12. Overall survival rates at 12 weeks were 50% in the single-fraction group vs 55% in the multifraction group (stratified hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.74-1.41]). Of the 11 other secondary end points that were analyzed, the between-group differences were not statistically significant or did not meet noninferiority criterion.

Conclusions and relevance: Among patients with malignant metastatic solid tumors and spinal canal compression, a single radiotherapy dose, compared with a multifraction dose delivered over 5 days, did not meet the criterion for noninferiority for the primary outcome (ambulatory at 8 weeks). However, the extent to which the lower bound of the CI overlapped with the noninferiority margin should be considered when interpreting the clinical importance of this finding.

Trial registration: ISRCTN Identifiers: ISRCTN97555949 and ISRCTN97108008.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Hoskin reported being supported by the National Institute for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Dr Beare reported receiving grants from Cancer Research UK during the conduct of the study. Dr Foran reported receiving personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck outside the submitted work. Dr Hackshaw reported receiving grants from Cancer Research UK during the conduct of the study and support from the University College London and University College London Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. Mr Lopes reported receiving support from the University College London and University College London Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. Dr Misra is the clinical lead for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Manchester, UK. Ms Reczko reported receiving grants from Cancer Research UK during the conduct of the study. Dr Roos reported receiving grants from the Cancer Council Queensland during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flow of Participants in a Study of the Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer (SCORAD Trial)
A total of 635 patients (93%) started radiotherapy on the day of randomization and all but 1 patient started radiotherapy within 24 hours of randomization.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Ambulatory Status of Participants in a Study of the Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer
If the lower boundary of any 1-sided 95% CI is lower than −11% (blue dotted line), single-fraction radiotherapy would not be considered noninferior to multifraction radiotherapy.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Overall Survival of Participants in a Study of the Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer
The median (interquartile range [IQR]) survival time was 12.4 (4.6 to 41.0) weeks in the single-fraction group and 13.6 (5.9-40.9) weeks in the multifraction group. The median (IQR) observation time was 13.7 (12.0-52.7) weeks in the single-fraction group and 12.9 (12 to 48.7) weeks in the multifraction group. The hazard ratio (HR) was stratified on baseline ambulatory status, primary tumor, extension of metastases, and hospital. Shared frailty Cox model HR with hospital as a random effect, 1.02 ([95% CI, 0.86-1.21]; P =.85).

References

    1. Metastatic spinal cord compression in adults: risk assessment, diagnosis and management. Manchester, UK: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence ; 2008. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg75/resources/metastatic-spinal-cord-c.... Published November 26, 2008. Accessed August 8, 2019. - PubMed
    1. Schmidt MH, Klimo P Jr, Vrionis FD. Metastatic spinal cord compression. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2005;3(5):711-719. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2005.0041 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loblaw DA, Laperriere NJ. Emergency treatment of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: an evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(4):1613-1624. doi:10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1613 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Loblaw DA, Perry J, Chambers A, Laperriere NJ. Systematic review of the diagnosis and management of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative’s Neuro-Oncology Disease Site Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(9):2028-2037. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.00.067 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chow E, Harris K, Fan G, Tsao M, Sze WM. Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(11):1423-1436. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5281 - DOI - PubMed