Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 29;7(12):627.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120627.

Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019

Affiliations
Review

Review on Immersion Vaccines for Fish: An Update 2019

Jarl Bøgwald et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Immersion vaccines are used for a variety of aquacultured fish to protect against infectious diseases caused by bacteria and viruses. During immersion vaccination the antigens are taken up by the skin, gills or gut and processed by the immune system, where the resulting response may lead to protection. The lack of classical secondary responses following repeated immersion vaccination may partly be explained by the limited uptake of antigens by immersion compared to injection. Administration of vaccines depends on the size of the fish. In most cases, immersion vaccination is inferior to injection vaccination with regard to achieved protection. However, injection is problematic in small fish, and fry as small as 0.5 gram may be immersion vaccinated when they are considered adaptively immunocompetent. Inactivated vaccines are, in many cases, weakly immunogenic, resulting in low protection after immersion vaccination. Therefore, during recent years, several studies have focused on different ways to augment the efficacy of these vaccines. Examples are booster vaccination, administration of immunostimulants/adjuvants, pretreatment with low frequency ultrasound, use of live attenuated and DNA vaccines, preincubation in hyperosmotic solutions, percutaneous application of a multiple puncture instrument and application of more suitable inactivation chemicals. Electrostatic coating with positively charged chitosan to obtain mucoadhesive vaccines and a more efficient delivery of inactivated vaccines has also been successful.

Keywords: aquaculture; diseases; fish; immersion vaccination; vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest

References

    1. Munang’andu H.M., Mutoloki S., Evensen O. An overview of challenges limiting the design of protective mucosal vaccines for finfish. Front. Immunol. 2015;6 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00542. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakanishi T., Ototake M. Antigen uptake and immune responses after immersion vaccination. Dev. Biol. 1997;90:59–68. - PubMed
    1. Moore J.D., Ototake M., Nakanishi T. Particulate antigen uptake during immersion immunisation of fish: The effectiveness of prolonged exposure and the roles of skin and gill. Fish Shellfish Immun. 1998;8:393–407. doi: 10.1006/fsim.1998.0143. - DOI
    1. Ji J., Torrealba D., Thwaite R., Gomez A.C., Parra D., Roher N. Nanostructured TNF alpha protein targets the zebrafish (Danio rerio) immune system through mucosal surfaces and improves the survival after Mycobacterium marinum lethal infection. Aquaculture. 2019;510:138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.05.050. - DOI
    1. Kole S., Qadiri S.S.N., Shin S.M., Kim W.S., Lee J., Jung S.J. PLGA encapsulated inactivated-viral vaccine: Formulation and evaluation of its protective efficacy against viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus (VHSV) infection in olive flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) vaccinated by mucosal delivery routes. Vaccine. 2019;37:973–983. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.063. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources