Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;140(10):1311-1318.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03319-z. Epub 2019 Dec 3.

Results of plate fixation for humerus fractures in a large single-center cohort

Affiliations

Results of plate fixation for humerus fractures in a large single-center cohort

B J M van de Wall et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to describe the results of plate fixation in one of the largest single-center cohorts that employs plate fixation as the golden standard. Additionally, risk factors related to a negative outcome were identified.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated for a humeral shaft fracture in a level-one trauma center between January 2010 and December 2017 with a mean follow-up of 1 year.

Results: Plate fixation was performed in 102 patients with a humeral shaft fracture. The mean age was 50 (SD 20) years with 54.9% (n = 56) being male. Forty-eight percent (n = 48) had an AO type-A, 34.3% (n = 35) type-B, and 18.7% (n = 19) type-C fracture. Deep surgical site infections and non-union occurred in 1% (n = 1) and 3.9% (n = 4) of patients, respectively. Revision of the implant was performed in 15.7% (n = 16) mainly due to implant-related complaints. Only one patient developed radial nerve palsy after surgery. The median duration to radiological fracture healing and full-weight bearing was 18 (range 7-65) weeks and 14 (range 6-56) weeks, respectively. Risk factors for negative outcome included higher age, osteoporosis, open and higher AO class fractures, performing surgery during out-office hours, and the use of LCP 3.5-mm plate and an anterolateral approach.

Conclusion: Plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures has low risks of complications. It should be emphasized that the complications can be further minimized with a greater surgical expertise and by refraining from performing a surgery during out-office hours.

Keywords: Humerus shaft fracture; Plate fixation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J et al (2006) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88(11):1469–1473 - DOI
    1. Hohmann E, Glatt V, Tetsworth K (2016) Minimally invasive plating versus either open reduction and plate fixation or intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 25(10):1634–1642 - DOI
    1. Zarkadis NJ, Eisenstein ED, Kusnezov NA et al (2018) Open reduction-internal fixation versus intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures: an expected value decision analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 27(2):204–210 - DOI
    1. Kurup H, Hossain M, Andrew JG (2011) Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005959.pub2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lopiz Y, Garcia-Coiradas J, Garcia-Fernandez C, Marco F (2014) Proximal humerus nailing: a randomized clinical trial between curvilinear and straight nails. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 23(3):369–376 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources