Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov 13:13:397.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00397. eCollection 2019.

Bridging the Gap Between Second Language Acquisition Research and Memory Science: The Case of Foreign Language Attrition

Affiliations

Bridging the Gap Between Second Language Acquisition Research and Memory Science: The Case of Foreign Language Attrition

Anne Mickan et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

The field of second language acquisition (SLA) is by nature of its subject a highly interdisciplinary area of research. Learning a (foreign) language, for example, involves encoding new words, consolidating and committing them to long-term memory, and later retrieving them. All of these processes have direct parallels in the domain of human memory and have been thoroughly studied by researchers in that field. Yet, despite these clear links, the two fields have largely developed in parallel and in isolation from one another. The present article aims to promote more cross-talk between SLA and memory science. We focus on foreign language (FL) attrition as an example of a research topic in SLA where the parallels with memory science are especially apparent. We discuss evidence that suggests that competition between languages is one of the mechanisms of FL attrition, paralleling the interference process thought to underlie forgetting in other domains of human memory. Backed up by concrete suggestions, we advocate the use of paradigms from the memory literature to study these interference effects in the language domain. In doing so, we hope to facilitate future cross-talk between the two fields and to further our understanding of FL attrition as a memory phenomenon.

Keywords: competition; foreign language attrition; forgetting; interference; memory; retrieval-induced forgetting; second language acquisition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 415–445. 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006 - DOI
    1. Anderson M. C. (2015). “Incidental forgetting,” in Memory, 2nd Edn. eds Baddeley A., Eysenck M. W., Anderson M. C. (London, New York, NY: Psychology Press; ), 231–263.
    1. Anderson M. C., Bjork R. A., Bjork E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 20, 1063–1087. 10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson M. C., Bjork E. L., Bjork R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7, 522–530. 10.3758/bf03214366 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aslan A., Bäuml K.-H. (2011). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37, 264–269. 10.1037/a0021324 - DOI - PubMed