Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 5;25(2):178-187.
doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz043.

Measuring Recovery in Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Tinnitus Patients in a Mental Health Care Setting: Validation of the I.ROC

Affiliations
Review

Measuring Recovery in Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Tinnitus Patients in a Mental Health Care Setting: Validation of the I.ROC

Karin C M Roze et al. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. .

Abstract

This study was aimed at validating the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) for deaf, hard-of-hearing, and tinnitus patients in a mental health care setting. There is a need for an accessible instrument to monitor treatment effects in this population. The I.ROC measures recovery, seeing recovery as a process of experiencing a meaningful life, despite the limitations caused by illness or disability. A total of 84 adults referred to 2 specialist mental health centers for deaf, hard-of-hearing, and tinnitus adults in the Netherlands completed the Dutch version of I.ROC and 3 other instruments. A total of 25 patients refused or did not complete the instruments: 50% of patients using sign language and 18% of patients using spoken language. Participants completed the measures at intake and then every 3 months. In this sample I.ROC demonstrated good internal consistency and convergent validity. Sensitivity to change was good, especially over a period of 6 or 9 months. This study provides preliminary evidence that the I.ROC is a valid instrument measuring recovery for hard-of-hearing and tinnitus patients using spoken language. For deaf patients using sign language, specifically those with limited language skills in spoken and written Dutch, more research is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akram B., & Shafiq S. (2014). Maltreatment among deaf, their non-disabled siblings and hearing children: Prevalence and prevention. European Academic Research, 1(10), 2963–2986.
    1. Andrews J. F., Leigh I., & Weiner M. T. (2004). Deaf people: Evolving perspectives from psychology, education and sociology. Pearson College Division.
    1. Anthony W. A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 16(4), 11–23. doi: 10.1037/h0095655 - DOI
    1. Bartels-Velthuis A. A., Visser E., Arends J., Pijnenborg G. H. M., Wunderink L., Jörg F., & Bruggeman R. (2018). Towards a comprehensive routine outcome monitoring program for people with psychotic disorders: The pharmacotherapy monitoring and outcome survey (PHAMOUS). Schizophrenia Research, 197, 281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.01.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boothroyd A., Geers A. E., & Moog J. S. (1991). Practical implications of cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 12, 81–89. - PubMed