Advanced quantitative estimation methods for spasticity: a literature review
- PMID: 31801402
- PMCID: PMC7607521
- DOI: 10.1177/0300060519888425
Advanced quantitative estimation methods for spasticity: a literature review
Abstract
Post-stroke spasticity seriously affects patients' quality of life. Spasticity is considered to involve both neural and non-neural factors. Current clinical scales, such as the Modified Ashworth Scale and the Modified Tardieu Scale, lack reliability and reproducibility. These scales are also unable to identify the neural and non-neural contributions to spasticity. Surface electromyography and biomechanical and myotonometry measurement methods for post-stroke spasticity are discussed in this report. Surface electromyography can provide neural information, while myotonometry can estimate muscular properties. Both the neural and non-neural contributions can be estimated by biomechanical measurement. These laboratory methods can quantitatively assess spasticity. They can provide more valuable information for further study on treatment and rehabilitation than clinical scales.
Keywords: Post-stroke spasticity; biomechanical; myotonometry; quantitative assessment; review; surface electromyogram.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia: a neurophysiological approach. New York: Medical Dept., Harper & Row, 1970, pp.113–122.
-
- Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, et al. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 2–6. - PubMed
-
- Lance J. Symposium synopsis in spasticity: disordered motor control. Feldman RG, Young RR, Koella WP, editors. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1980.
-
- Young R. Spasticity: a review. Neurology 1994; 44: S12–S20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
