Authors' Reply to Nicolas: "Why Were More than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?"
- PMID: 31802398
- PMCID: PMC7007421
- DOI: 10.1007/s40262-019-00851-4
Authors' Reply to Nicolas: "Why Were More than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?"
Conflict of interest statement
Didier Concordet, Peggy Gandia, Jean-Louis Montastruc, Alain Bousquet-Mélou, Peter Lees, Aude A. Ferran, and Pierre-Louis Toutain have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this reply.
Comment on
-
Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Jan;59(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00812-x. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020. PMID: 31432471 Free PMC article.
-
Comment on: "Why Were More Than 200 Subjects Required to Demonstrate the Bioequivalence of a New Formulation of Levothyroxine with an Old One?".Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Feb;59(2):273-275. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00849-y. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020. PMID: 31802399 No abstract available.
References
-
- Anonymous. Draft guidance on levothyroxine sodium. Food and Drug Administration; 2018: p. 2. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformat.... Accessed 4 Oct 2019.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources