Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jul-Aug;22(4):320-331.
doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_439_18.

Reciprocating kinematics leads to lower incidences of postoperative pain than rotary kinematics after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Review

Reciprocating kinematics leads to lower incidences of postoperative pain than rotary kinematics after endodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Christine Men Martins et al. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Extrusion of infected debris into the periapical tissue has been cited as the major cause of postoperative pain, regardless of instrumentation technique.

Aim: Comprehensively review two different kinematics of instrumentation (reciprocating and rotary) and association to the postoperative pain after endodontic treatment.

Methods: Two investigators performed a systematic review with meta-analysis. MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus supplied relevant data from studies published until February 2018 to answer the PICO question. Primary outcome was overall postoperative pain, and the secondary outcomes were nature of the pain (mild, moderate, and severe) at 12, 24, and 48 h.

Results: Ten randomized clinical trials fulfilled eligibility criteria, and five of them were submitted in the meta-analysis. Primary outcome indicated that reciprocating system results in less postoperative pain compared to rotary system (P < 0.05). As a secondary outcome, there was no statistical difference for mild, moderate, and severe pain after 12 and 24 h using reciprocating or rotary systems (P > 0.05). However, the reciprocation system showed less severe pain after 48 h (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Rotary motion had a negative impact on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Furthermore, after 48 h, more patients presented severe pain under rotary motion. More randomized clinical studies would be helpful.

Keywords: Endodontics; postoperative pain; reciprocating system; root canal therapy; rotary system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram of the literature search
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot and funnel plot; comparison of rotary and reciprocating system on postoperative pain: (a) Overall; (b-d) according to the nature of postoperative pain - mild, moderate, and severe - after 12 h; (e-g) according to the nature of postoperative pain - mild, moderate, and severe - after 24 h; (h-j) according to the nature of postoperative pain - mild, moderate, and severe - after 48 h

References

    1. Reese R, Aminoshariae A, Montagnese T, Mickel A. Influence of demographics on patients' receipt of endodontic therapy or implant placement. J Endod. 2015;41:470–2. - PubMed
    1. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. The prevalence of postoperative pain and flare-up in single- and multiple-visit endodontic treatment: A systematic review. Int Endod J. 2008;41:91–9. - PubMed
    1. El Mubarak AH, Abu-bakr NH, Ibrahim YE. Postoperative pain in multiple-visit and single-visit root canal treatment. J Endod. 2010;36:36–9. - PubMed
    1. Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Giardino L, Palazzi F, Asgary S. Impact of ultrasonic activation on the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite: A review. Iran Endod J. 2015;10:216–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neelakantan P, Sharma S. Pain after single-visit root canal treatment with two single-file systems based on different kinematics – A prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19:2211–7. - PubMed