Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Nov 14:10:1150.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01150. eCollection 2019.

DNA Methylation Cancer Biomarkers: Translation to the Clinic

Affiliations
Review

DNA Methylation Cancer Biomarkers: Translation to the Clinic

Warwick J Locke et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Carcinogenesis is accompanied by widespread DNA methylation changes within the cell. These changes are characterized by a globally hypomethylated genome with focal hypermethylation of numerous 5'-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-3' (CpG) islands, often spanning gene promoters and first exons. Many of these epigenetic changes occur early in tumorigenesis and are highly pervasive across a tumor type. This allows DNA methylation cancer biomarkers to be suitable for early detection and also to have utility across a range of areas relevant to cancer detection and treatment. Such tests are also simple in construction, as only one or a few loci need to be targeted for good test coverage. These properties make cancer-associated DNA methylation changes very attractive for development of cancer biomarker tests with substantive clinical utility. Across the patient journey from initial detection, to treatment and then monitoring, there are several points where DNA methylation assays can inform clinical practice. Assays on surgically removed tumor tissue are useful to determine indicators of treatment resistance, prognostication of outcome, or to molecularly characterize, classify, and determine the tissue of origin of a tumor. Cancer-associated DNA methylation changes can also be detected with accuracy in the cell-free DNA present in blood, stool, urine, and other biosamples. Such tests hold great promise for the development of simple, economical, and highly specific cancer detection tests suitable for population-wide screening, with several successfully translated examples already. The ability of circulating tumor DNA liquid biopsy assays to monitor cancer in situ also allows for the ability to monitor response to therapy, to detect minimal residual disease and as an early biomarker for cancer recurrence. This review will summarize existing DNA methylation cancer biomarkers used in clinical practice across the application domains above, discuss what makes a suitable DNA methylation cancer biomarker, and identify barriers to translation. We discuss technical factors such as the analytical performance and product-market fit, factors that contribute to successful downstream investment, including geography, and how this impacts intellectual property, regulatory hurdles, and the future of the marketplace and healthcare system.

Keywords: DNA methylation; cancer; diagnostic; epigenetics; liquid biopsy; translation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cancer epigenetic biomarker publications per annum versus cumulative registered DNA-methylated based IVDs. The figure demonstrates the number of cancer epigenetic biomarker academic publications per annum over the last 20 years (left axis) in comparison with the cumulative number of registered cancer epigenetic diagnostic tests available on the market (right axis). A PubMed search utilizing the term ‘epigenetic biomarkers cancer’ was used to determine the number of publications per year and the number of registered tests is referenced in Table 1 .

References

    1. Aberg K. A., Xie L., Chan R. F., Zhao M., Pandey A. K., Kumar G., et al. (2015). Evaluation of methyl-binding domain based enrichment approaches revisited. PloS One 10 (7), e0132205. 10.1371/journal.pone.0132205 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adler A., Geiger S., Keil A., Bias H., Schatz P., Vos T., et al. (2014). Improving compliance to colorectal cancer screening using blood and stool based tests in patients refusing screening colonoscopy in Germany. BMC Gastroenterol. 14, 183. 10.1186/1471-230X-14-183 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahlquist D. A., Taylor W. R., Mahoney D. W., Zou H., Domanico M., Thibodeau S. N., et al. (2012). The stool DNA test is more accurate than the plasma septin 9 test in detecting colorectal neoplasia. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10 (3), 272–277 e271. 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.10.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ali H., Donovan B., Wand H., Read T. R., Regan D. G., Grulich A. E., et al. (2013). Genital warts in young Australians five years into national human papillomavirus vaccination programme: national surveillance data. BMJ 346, f2032. 10.1136/bmj.f2032 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alvarez H., Opalinska J., Zhou L., Sohal D., Fazzari M. J., Yu Y., et al. (2011). Widespread hypomethylation occurs early and synergizes with gene amplification during esophageal carcinogenesis. PloS Genet. 7 (3), e1001356. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001356 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources