Risk Factors for Infections Involving Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices
- PMID: 31806127
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.060
Risk Factors for Infections Involving Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices
Erratum in
-
Correction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 25;75(7):840-841. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Jan 11. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32081293 No abstract available.
-
Correction.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Aug 11;76(6):762. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.001. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32762915 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac implantable electronic device infection is a major complication that usually requires device removal. PADIT (Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial) was a large cluster crossover trial of conventional versus incremental antibiotics.
Objectives: This study sought to investigate independent predictors of device infection in PADIT and develop a novel infection risk score.
Methods: In brief, over 4 6-month periods, 28 centers used either conventional or incremental prophylactic antibiotic treatment in all patients. The primary outcome was hospitalization for device infection within 1 year (blinded endpoint adjudication). Multivariable logistic prediction modeling was used to identify the independent predictors and develop a risk score for device infection. The prediction models were internally validated with bootstrap methods.
Results: Device procedures were performed in 19,603 patients, and hospitalization for infection occurred in 177 (0.90%) within 1 year of follow-up. The final prediction model identified 5 independent predictors of device infection (prior procedures [P], age [A], depressed renal function [D], immunocompromised [I], and procedure type [T]) with an optimism-corrected C-statistic of 0.704 (95% confidence interval: 0.660 to 0.744). A PADIT risk score ranging from 0 to 15 points classified patients into low (0 to 4), intermediate (5 to 6) and high (≥7) risk groups with rates of hospitalization for infection of 0.51%, 1.42%, and 3.41%, respectively.
Conclusions: This study identified 5 independent predictors of device infection and developed a novel infection risk score in the largest cardiac implantable electronic device trial to date, warranting validation in an independent cohort. The 5 independent predictors in the PADIT score are readily adopted into clinical practice. (Prevention of Arrhythmia Device Infection Trial [PADIT Pilot]; NCT01002911).
Keywords: antibiotics; cardiac implantable electronic device; implantable cardioverter defibrillator; infection; pacemaker.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Comment in
-
Patients at High Risk for CIED Infection: Does Our Perception Mirror Reality?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 10;74(23):2855-2857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.058. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31806128 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical