Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;7(20):534.
doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.140.

Preemptive renal replacement therapy in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock patients: a historically controlled cohort study

Affiliations

Preemptive renal replacement therapy in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock patients: a historically controlled cohort study

Guo-Wei Tu et al. Ann Transl Med. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the preemptive renal replacement therapy (RRT) might improve outcomes in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) patients.

Methods: In Period A (September 2014-April 2016), patients with PCCS received RRT, depending on conventional indications or bedside attendings. In Period B (May 2016-November 2017), the preemptive RRT strategy was implemented in all PCCS patients in our intensive care unit. The goal-directed RRT was applied for the RRT patients. The hospital mortality and renal recovery were compared between the two periods.

Results: A total of 155 patients (76 patients in Period A and 79 patients in Period B) were ultimately enrolled in this study. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative parameters between the two groups. The duration between surgery and RRT initiation was significantly shorter in Period B than in Period A [23 (17, 66) vs. 47 (20, 127) h, P<0.01]. The hospital mortality in Period B was significantly lower than that in Period A (38.0% vs. 59.2%, P<0.01). There were fewer patients with no renal recovery in Period B (4.1% vs. 19.4%, P=0.026). Patients in Period B displayed a significantly shorter time to completely renal recovery (12±15 vs. 25±15 d, P<0.05).

Conclusions: Among PCCS patients, preemptive RRT compared with conventional initiation of RRT reduced mortality in hospital and also led to faster and more frequent recovery of renal function. Our preliminary study supposed that preemptive initiation of RRT might be an effective approach to PCCS with acute kidney injury (AKI).

Keywords: Renal replacement therapy (RRT); acute kidney injury (AKI); cardiac surgery; cardiogenic shock (CS); timing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study. PCCS, post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock; RRT, renal replacement therapy; ESRD, end-stage renal disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evolution of hemodynamic parameters over time. Error bars are standard deviation. The asterisk (*) and the blue triangle indicate P<0.05, compared with 0 h. MAP, mean artery pressure; CVP, central venous pressure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curves for in-hospital mortality.
Figure S1
Figure S1
Evolution of hemodynamic parameters over time in survivors. The asterisk (*) and the blue triangle indicate P<0.05, compared with 0 h.
Figure S2
Figure S2
Evolution of hemodynamic parameters over time in non-survivors. The asterisk (*) and the blue triangle indicate P<0.05, compared with 0 h.

Comment in

References

    1. Khorsandi M, Shaikhrezai K, Prasad S, et al. Advanced mechanical circulatory support for post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock: a 20-year outcome analysis in a non-transplant unit. J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;11:29. 10.1186/s13019-016-0430-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pérez Vela JL, Jimenez Rivera JJ, Alcala Llorente MA, et al. Low cardiac output syndrome in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery. Profile, differences in clinical course and prognosis. The ESBAGA study. Med Intensiva 2018;42:159-67. - PubMed
    1. Yang XM, Tu GW, Zheng JL, et al. A comparison of early versus late initiation of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Nephrol 2017;18:264. 10.1186/s12882-017-0667-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lai TS, Shiao CC, Wang JJ, et al. Earlier versus later initiation of renal replacement therapy among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Intensive Care 2017;7:38. 10.1186/s13613-017-0265-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Z. No "optimal timing" of renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Ann Transl Med 2018;6:S112. 10.21037/atm.2018.11.62 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources