Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Mar;85(2):464-479.
doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01262-7. Epub 2019 Dec 5.

Spontaneous and deliberate future thinking: a dual process account

Affiliations
Review

Spontaneous and deliberate future thinking: a dual process account

Scott Cole et al. Psychol Res. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

In this article, we address an apparent paradox in the literature on mental time travel and mind-wandering: How is it possible that future thinking is both constructive, yet often experienced as occurring spontaneously? We identify and describe two 'routes' whereby episodic future thoughts are brought to consciousness, with each of the 'routes' being associated with separable cognitive processes and functions. Voluntary future thinking relies on controlled, deliberate and slow cognitive processing. The other, termed involuntary or spontaneous future thinking, relies on automatic processes that allows 'fully-fledged' episodic future thoughts to freely come to mind, often triggered by internal or external cues. To unravel the paradox, we propose that the majority of spontaneous future thoughts are 'pre-made' (i.e., each spontaneous future thought is a re-iteration of a previously constructed future event), and therefore based on simple, well-understood, memory processes. We also propose that the pre-made hypothesis explains why spontaneous future thoughts occur rapidly, are similar to involuntary memories, and predominantly about upcoming tasks and goals. We also raise the possibility that spontaneous future thinking is the default mode of imagining the future. This dual process approach complements and extends standard theoretical approaches that emphasise constructive simulation, and outlines novel opportunities for researchers examining voluntary and spontaneous forms of future thinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author SC declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author LK declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Knowledge structure representing autobiographical memory and future thought in the revised Self memory system (Conway et al. 2019) (Image taken from Conway et al. (2019). With permission from Martin Conway)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Addis DR, Musicaro R, Pan L, Schacter DL. Episodic simulation of past and future events in older adults: Evidence from an experimental recombination task. Psychology and Aging. 2010;25:369–376. doi: 10.1037/a0017280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addis DR, Wong A, Schacter DL. Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:1363–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addis DR, Wong AT, Schacter DL. Age-related changes in the episodic simulation of future events. Psychological Science. 2008;19:33–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02043.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Altgassen M, Rendell PG, Bernhard A, Henry JD, Bailey PE, Phillips LH, Kliegel M. Future thinking improves prospective memory performance and plan enactment in older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2015;68:192–204. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.956127. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson RA. Imagining novel futures: The roles of event plausibility and familiarity. Memory. 2012;20(5):443–451. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.677450. - DOI - PubMed