Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;34(1):29-46.
doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00688-2.

Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: Impact of Pharmacological Treatment

Affiliations
Review

Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: Impact of Pharmacological Treatment

Ni Xu et al. CNS Drugs. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Bipolar disorder is an illness characterised by periods of elated and depressed mood. These mood episodes are associated with changes in cognitive function and there is evidence to suggest that cognitive dysfunction persists during euthymia. The extent to which this is a function of the illness or a result of treatment is less clear. In this narrative review, we explore the impact of commonly used medications for bipolar disorder on cognitive function. Specific impairments in executive function and verbal memory have been noted in bipolar disorder. The impact of pharmacological treatments upon cognitive function is mixed with a number of studies reporting conflicting results. Interpretation of the data is further complicated by the variety of cognitive tests employed, study design, the relatively small numbers of patients included and confounding by indication. Overall, there is some evidence that while lithium improves some cognitive domains, it impedes others. Antipsychotics may be deleterious to cognition, although this may relate to the patient population in which they are prescribed. Sodium valproate is also associated with worse cognitive outcomes, while the impact of other antiepileptics is unclear. Overall the quality of evidence is poor and is derived from a relatively small number of studies that often do not account for the significant heterogeneity of the disorder or common comorbidities. The use of consistent methodologies and measures of cognition across studies, as well as in naturalistic settings, would enable more certain conclusions to be drawn.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;159(7):1146-54 - PubMed
    1. Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;71:25-32 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;65(11):1483-90 - PubMed
    1. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;59(1):62-9 - PubMed
    1. Am J Pathol. 2007 May;170(5):1669-75 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances