Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 1;20(Suppl 2):S2-S8.
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz245.

Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion)

Affiliations
Review

Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion)

Kevin Cairns et al. Pain Med. .

Abstract

Objective: There are several treatment options for patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis, including surgical and conservative care. Interspinous spacer decompression using the Superion device offers a less invasive procedure for patients who fail conservative treatment before traditional decompression surgery. This review assesses the current cost-effectiveness, safety, and performance of lumbar spinal stenosis treatment modalities compared with the Superion interspinous spacer procedure.

Methods: EMBASE and PubMed were searched to find studies reporting on the cost-effectiveness, safety, and performance of conservative treatment, including medicinal treatments, epidural injections, physical therapy, and alternative methods, as well as surgical treatment, including laminectomy, laminectomy with fusion, and interspinous spacer decompression. Results were supplemented with manual searches.

Results: Despite substantial costs, persistent conservative treatment (>12 weeks) of lumbar spinal stenosis showed only minimal improvement in pain and functionality. When conservative treatment fails, surgery is more effective than continuing conservative treatment. Lumbar laminectomy with fusion has considerably greater cost than laminectomy alone, as the length of hospital stay increases, the costs for implants are substantial, and complications increase. Although laminectomy and the Superion have comparable outcomes, the Superion implant is positioned percutaneously. This approach may minimize the direct and indirect costs of outpatient rehabilitation and absenteeism, respectively.

Conclusions: Superion interspinous lumbar decompression is a minimally invasive procedure for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who have failed conservative treatment. Compared with extending conservative treatment or traditional spinal surgery, interspinous lumbar decompression reduces the direct and indirect costs associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Keywords: Epidural Steroids Injections; Interspinous Lumbar Decompression; Interspinous Spacers; Laminectomy; Lumbar Spinal Stenosis; Neurogenic Claudication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lurie JD. Interspinous spacers for lumbar spinal stenosis: Commentary on van den Akker-van Marle. Spine J 2016;166:711–3. - PubMed
    1. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: The Framingham Study. Spine J 2009;97:545–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Schepper EI, Overdevest GM, Suri P, et al. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: An updated systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;388:E469–81. - PubMed
    1. Aichmair A, Burgstaller JM, Schwenkglenks M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: Analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS). Eur Spine J 2017;262:501–9. - PubMed
    1. Adogwa O, Davison MA, Vuong VD, et al. Long term costs of maximum non-operative treatments in patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis that ultimately required surgery: A five-year cost analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019;446:424–30. - PubMed

Publication types