Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion)
- PMID: 31808529
- PMCID: PMC6896024
- DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz245
Cost-effectiveness and Safety of Interspinous Process Decompression (Superion)
Abstract
Objective: There are several treatment options for patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis, including surgical and conservative care. Interspinous spacer decompression using the Superion device offers a less invasive procedure for patients who fail conservative treatment before traditional decompression surgery. This review assesses the current cost-effectiveness, safety, and performance of lumbar spinal stenosis treatment modalities compared with the Superion interspinous spacer procedure.
Methods: EMBASE and PubMed were searched to find studies reporting on the cost-effectiveness, safety, and performance of conservative treatment, including medicinal treatments, epidural injections, physical therapy, and alternative methods, as well as surgical treatment, including laminectomy, laminectomy with fusion, and interspinous spacer decompression. Results were supplemented with manual searches.
Results: Despite substantial costs, persistent conservative treatment (>12 weeks) of lumbar spinal stenosis showed only minimal improvement in pain and functionality. When conservative treatment fails, surgery is more effective than continuing conservative treatment. Lumbar laminectomy with fusion has considerably greater cost than laminectomy alone, as the length of hospital stay increases, the costs for implants are substantial, and complications increase. Although laminectomy and the Superion have comparable outcomes, the Superion implant is positioned percutaneously. This approach may minimize the direct and indirect costs of outpatient rehabilitation and absenteeism, respectively.
Conclusions: Superion interspinous lumbar decompression is a minimally invasive procedure for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who have failed conservative treatment. Compared with extending conservative treatment or traditional spinal surgery, interspinous lumbar decompression reduces the direct and indirect costs associated with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Keywords: Epidural Steroids Injections; Interspinous Lumbar Decompression; Interspinous Spacers; Laminectomy; Lumbar Spinal Stenosis; Neurogenic Claudication.
© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanics and Mechanism of Action of Indirect Lumbar Decompression and the Evolution of a Stand-alone Spinous Process Spacer.Pain Med. 2019 Dec 1;20(Suppl 2):S14-S22. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz129. Pain Med. 2019. PMID: 31808533 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Superion interspinous process spacer for intermittent neurogenic claudication secondary to moderate lumbar spinal stenosis: two-year results from a randomized controlled FDA-IDE pivotal trial.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Mar 1;40(5):275-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000735. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015. PMID: 25494323 Clinical Trial.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Novel Interventional Techniques for Chronic Pain: Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Disc Disease-MILD Percutaneous Image Guided Lumbar Decompression, Vertiflex Interspinous Spacer, MinuteMan G3 Interspinous-Interlaminar Fusion.Adv Ther. 2021 Sep;38(9):4628-4645. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01875-8. Epub 2021 Aug 14. Adv Ther. 2021. PMID: 34398386 Review.
-
Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression and Interspinous Process Device for the Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Literature Review.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Feb 18;24(4):13. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-0845-2. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020. PMID: 32072362
-
Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices.Spine J. 2018 Apr;18(4):584-592. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.246. Epub 2017 Aug 25. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 28847740
Cited by
-
A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications.Cureus. 2021 Nov 10;13(11):e19454. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19454. eCollection 2021 Nov. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34912602 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal Analysis of the Care Pathway of Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in the US.J Pain Res. 2024 Jun 4;17:1979-1987. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S454887. eCollection 2024. J Pain Res. 2024. PMID: 38854929 Free PMC article.
-
Web-based machine learning application for interpretable prediction of prolonged length of stay after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a retrospective cohort study with explainable AI.Front Physiol. 2025 Feb 19;16:1542240. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1542240. eCollection 2025. Front Physiol. 2025. PMID: 40046179 Free PMC article.
-
A Differential Clinical Benefit Examination of Full Lumbar Endoscopy vs Interspinous Process Spacers in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis: An Effect Size Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.Int J Spine Surg. 2022 Feb;16(1):102-123. doi: 10.14444/8200. Epub 2022 Feb 17. Int J Spine Surg. 2022. PMID: 35177530 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison analysis of safety outcomes and the rate of subsequent spinal procedures between interspinous spacer without decompression versus minimally invasive lumbar decompression.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jan 11;49(1):30-35. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104236. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024. PMID: 37247945 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lurie JD. Interspinous spacers for lumbar spinal stenosis: Commentary on van den Akker-van Marle. Spine J 2016;166:711–3. - PubMed
-
- de Schepper EI, Overdevest GM, Suri P, et al. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: An updated systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;388:E469–81. - PubMed
-
- Aichmair A, Burgstaller JM, Schwenkglenks M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: Analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS). Eur Spine J 2017;262:501–9. - PubMed
-
- Adogwa O, Davison MA, Vuong VD, et al. Long term costs of maximum non-operative treatments in patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis or spondylolisthesis that ultimately required surgery: A five-year cost analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019;446:424–30. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical