Prevalence of Intimate Partner Reproductive Coercion in the United States: Racial and Ethnic Differences
- PMID: 31808711
- PMCID: PMC7274854
- DOI: 10.1177/0886260519888205
Prevalence of Intimate Partner Reproductive Coercion in the United States: Racial and Ethnic Differences
Abstract
Reproductive coercion (RC) is a specific type of intimate partner violence (IPV). Although clinical studies have highlighted women's experiences of RC, we know little about its national prevalence and differences in prevalence by sex category and race/ethnicity. Data are from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS), years 2010 to 2012. NISVS is an ongoing, nationally representative random-digit-dial telephone survey of the noninstitutionalized English- or Spanish-speaking U.S. adult population. This article reports the national lifetime and 12-month prevalence of two RC victimization measures, and proportions among IPV victims. T tests were used to examine differences in estimates across racial/ethnic groups. In the United States, 9.7% of men and 8.4% of women experienced any RC by an intimate partner during their lifetime. Men reported more commonly than women that a partner tried to get pregnant when the man did not want her to; women reported higher prevalence of partner condom refusal. Examination by race/ethnicity revealed that non-Hispanic (NH) Black women and men had significantly higher lifetime prevalence of both RC types than all other groups; in the last 12 months, NH Blacks had significantly higher prevalence across the board than NH Whites. Hispanics had significantly higher lifetime and 12-month prevalence of any RC and partner condom refusal than NH Whites. RC is at the intersection of two public health concerns-IPV and reproductive health. Documenting its prevalence and differences by sex and race/ethnicity may inform prevention efforts to reduce occurrence and negative health outcomes among specific populations.
Keywords: anything related to domestic violence; domestic violence; domestic violence and cultural contexts; sexual assault; sexuality.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization--national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, United States, 2011.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Sep 5;63(8):1-18. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014. PMID: 25188037 Free PMC article.
-
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Women's Experiences of Reproductive Coercion, Intimate Partner Violence, and Unintended Pregnancy.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Aug;26(8):828-835. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5996. Epub 2017 Apr 12. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017. PMID: 28402692 Free PMC article.
-
Racial Differences in Pregnancy Intention, Reproductive Coercion, and Partner Violence among Family Planning Clients: A Qualitative Exploration.Womens Health Issues. 2018 May-Jun;28(3):205-211. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Apr 7. Womens Health Issues. 2018. PMID: 29631975 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive Coercion by Male Sexual Partners: Associations With Partner Violence and College Women's Sexual Health.J Interpers Violence. 2017 Nov;32(21):3301-3320. doi: 10.1177/0886260515597441. Epub 2015 Aug 5. J Interpers Violence. 2017. PMID: 26246119 Free PMC article.
-
Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: A Review of Terms, Definitions, and Prevalence.Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015 Jul;16(3):316-35. doi: 10.1177/1524838014557290. Epub 2015 Jan 4. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015. PMID: 25561088 Review.
Cited by
-
Contraceptive Use Among Women Experiencing Intimate Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: The Moderating Role of PTSD and Depression.Violence Against Women. 2024 Jul;30(9):2075-2095. doi: 10.1177/10778012231153372. Epub 2023 Feb 9. Violence Against Women. 2024. PMID: 36762382 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration Among Young Adult Males.Violence Against Women. 2023 Nov;29(14):2775-2786. doi: 10.1177/10778012231196059. Epub 2023 Aug 21. Violence Against Women. 2023. PMID: 37603586 Free PMC article.
-
State abortion restrictiveness and prevalence of intimate partner violence and domestic violence among recently birthing black and white individuals.Front Reprod Health. 2025 Apr 14;7:1535865. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1535865. eCollection 2025. Front Reprod Health. 2025. PMID: 40297131 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive Coercion by Intimate Partners: Prevalence and Correlates in Canadian Individuals with the Capacity to be Pregnant.PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0283240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283240. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37535635 Free PMC article.
-
Nonuse of Contraception at Conception Due to Partner Objection and Pregnancy-Related Health Care Utilization, Postpartum Health, and Infant Birth Outcomes.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Apr;34(4):525-538. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0535. Epub 2024 Nov 27. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025. PMID: 39605210 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alexander KA, Grace KT, Sacko C, Morgan A, & Sanders RA (2018). “Having a child meant I had a real life”: Childbearing motivations and reproductive coercion among urban socioeconomically disadvantaged Black young men. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(2), Article S18.
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2013). Reproductive and sexual coercion: ACOG Committee opinion no. 554. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 121, 411–415. - PubMed
-
- Basile KC, DeGue S, Jones K, Freire K, Dills J, Smith SG, & Raiford JL (2016). STOP SV: A technical package to prevent sexual violence. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical