Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul;134(4):1451-1455.
doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02221-y. Epub 2019 Dec 6.

The effect of different imaging techniques for the visualisation of evidence in court on jury comprehension

D Errickson  1 , H Fawcett  2 , T J U Thompson  3 , A Campbell  3
Affiliations

The effect of different imaging techniques for the visualisation of evidence in court on jury comprehension

D Errickson et al. Int J Legal Med. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Evidence presented within a courtroom should be clear so that the members of the jury can understand it. The presentation of distressing images, such as human remains, can have a negative effect on the jury since photographic images may evoke emotional responses. Therefore, it is important to understand how other visual mediums may improve comprehension, bias, or distress individuals. For this study, 91 individuals were randomly assigned one of three visual evidence formats in a mock courtroom exercise. These included photographs, 3D visualisations, or a 3D-printed model. The results show that the use of 3D imaging improves the juror's understanding of technical language used within a courtroom, which in turn better informs the juror's in their decision-making.

Keywords: 3D imaging; 3D printing; Bias; Courtroom; Decision-making; Perception; Photography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A photograph (a), 3D reconstruction (b), and 3D-printed model (c) of the cranium from Stanground South, Peterborough [19]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Morgan RM, Bull PA. Forensic geoscience and crime detection. Identification, interpretation and presentation in forensic geoscience. Minerva Med. 2007;127(2):73–89.
    1. Burgoon JK, Bonito JA, Bengtsson B, Cederberg C, Lundeberg M, Allspach L. Interactivity in human-computer: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence. Comput Hum Behav. 2000;16:553–574. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00029-7. - DOI
    1. Burns D. When used in the criminal legal process forensic science shows a bias in favour of the prosecution. Sci Justice. 2001;41(4):271–277. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(01)71910-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. March J, Schofield D, Evison M, Woodford N (2004) Three-dimensional computer visualization of forensic pathology data. Am J Forensic Med 60–70 - PubMed
    1. Durnal EW. Crime scene investigations (as seen on TV) Forensic Sci Int. 2010;199:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.015. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources