Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Mar;141(3):221-230.
doi: 10.1111/acps.13139. Epub 2020 Jan 12.

Better care for less money: cost-effectiveness of integrated care in multi-episode patients with severe psychosis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Better care for less money: cost-effectiveness of integrated care in multi-episode patients with severe psychosis

A Karow et al. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To compare cost-effectiveness of integrated care with therapeutic assertive community treatment (IC-TACT) versus standard care (SC) in multiple-episode psychosis.

Method: Twelve-month IC-TACT in patients with schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar I disorders were compared with a historical control group. Primary outcomes were entropy-balanced cost-effectiveness based on mental healthcare costs from a payers' perspective and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as a measure of health effects during 12-month follow-up.

Results: At baseline, patients in IC-TACT (n = 214) had significantly higher illness severity and lower functioning than SC (n = 56). Over 12 months, IC-TACT had significantly lower days in inpatient (10.3 ± 20.5 vs. 28.2 ± 44.9; P = 0.005) and day-clinic care (2.6 ± 16.7 vs. 16.4 ± 33.7; P = 0.004) and correspondingly lower costs (€-55 084). Within outpatient care, IC-TACT displayed a higher number of treatment contacts (116.3 ± 45.3 vs. 15.6 ± 6.3) and higher related costs (€+1417). Both resulted in lower total costs in IC-TACT (mean difference = €-13 248 ± 2975, P < 0.001). Adjusted incremental QALYs were significantly higher for IC-TACT versus SC (+0.10 ± 0.37, P = 0.05). The probability of cost-effectiveness of IC-TACT was constantly higher than 99%.

Conclusion: IC-TACT was cost-effective compared with SC. The use of prima facies 'costly' TACT teams is highly recommended to improve outcomes and save total cost for patients with severe psychotic disorders.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01888627 NCT01081418.

Keywords: QALY; Schizophrenia; assertive community treatment; bipolar disorder; cost utility; severe mental illness.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Delespaul PH. Consensus regarding the definition of persons with severe mental illness and the number of such persons in the Netherlands. Tijdschr Psychiatr 2013;55:427-438.
    1. Bagalman E, Napili A. Prevalence of Mental Illness in the United States: Data Sources and Estimates, in Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service. Washington, D.C.: U.L.G.D. Department, Editor. 2015.
    1. Lambert M, Ruppelt F, Siem A-K et al. Comorbidity of chronic somatic diseases in patients with psychotic disorders and their influence on 4-year outcomes of integrated care treatment (ACCESS II study). Schizophr Res 2017;193:377-383.
    1. Conus P, Cotton S, Schimmelmann BG et al. Rates and predictors of 18-months remission in an epidemiological cohort of 661 patients with first-episode psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017;52:1089-1099.
    1. Fleischhacker WW, Cetkovich-Bakmas M, De Hert M et al. Comorbid somatic illnesses in patients with severe mental disorders: clinical, policy, and research challenges. J Clin Psychiatry 2008;69:514-519.

Publication types

Associated data