Adaptive heading performance during self-motion perception

Abstract

Previous studies have documented that the perception of self-motion direction can be extracted from the patterns of image motion on the retina (also termed optic flow). Self-motion perception remains stable even when the optic-flow information is distorted by concurrent gaze shifts from body/eye rotations. This has been interpreted that extraretinal signals-efference copies of eye/body movements-are involved in compensating for retinal distortions. Here, we tested an alternative hypothesis to the extraretinal interpretation. We hypothesized that accurate self-motion perception can be achieved from a purely optic-flow-based visual strategy acquired through experience, independent of extraretinal mechanism. To test this, we asked human subjects to perform a self-motion direction discrimination task under normal optic flow (fixation condition) or distorted optic flow resulted from either realistic (pursuit condition) or simulated (simulated condition) eye movements. The task was performed either without (pre- and posttraining) or with (during training) the feedback about the correct answer. We first replicated the previous observation that before training, direction perception was greatly impaired in the simulated condition where the optic flow was distorted and extraretinal eye movement signals were absent. We further showed that after a few training sessions, the initial impairment in direction perception was gradually improved. These results reveal that behavioral training can enforce the exploitation of retinal cues to compensate for the distortion, without the contribution from the extraretinal signals. Our results suggest that self-motion perception is a flexible and adaptive process which might depend on neural plasticity in relevant cortical areas.

Keywords: behavioral training; extraretinal signal; neural plasticity; optic flow; self-motion perception.