Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;8(6):446-451.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692470. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

Scaphoid Fracture Patterns-Part Two: Reproducibility and Demographics of a Simplified Scaphoid Fracture Classification

Tessa Drijkoningen  1 , Amin Mohamadi  1 , Wouter F van Leeuwen  1 , Yonatan Schwarcz  2 , David Ring  3 , Geert A Buijze  4
Affiliations

Scaphoid Fracture Patterns-Part Two: Reproducibility and Demographics of a Simplified Scaphoid Fracture Classification

Tessa Drijkoningen et al. J Wrist Surg. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Objective To analyze the reproducibility, reliability, and demographics of a simplified anatomical scaphoid fracture classification based on posteroanterior radiographs using a large database of scaphoid fractures. Methods The study consisted of a retrospective review of electronic medical records of 871 consecutive patients. All patients presented between 2003 and 2014 at two centers. Patient- and surgeon-related factors were analyzed. Additionally, interobserver reliability of the Herbert and simplified scaphoid fracture classifications were tested. Results Proximal pole fractures were defined as fractures in which the center of the fracture line was proximal to the distal scapholunate interval (n = 30), waist fractures (n = 802) were defined as fractures involving the scaphocapitate interval, and distal tubercle fractures (n = 39) were defined as fractures involving the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) interval. The interobserver reliability of the simplified classification was fair (κ = 0.37) as for the Herbert classification (κ = 0.31). The average doubt of the answers of the observers was 2.1 on a scale from 0 to 10 for the simplified classification and 3.6 for the Herbert classification ( P < 0.05). Conclusions All complete fractures across the entire scaphoid distal to the scapholunate articulation and proximal to the STT joint can be classified as waist fractures; nonwaist scaphoid fractures are uncommon (6%) and have somewhat different presentations compared to waist fractures. Simplifying the fracture classification slightly improves interobserver reliability, although remaining fair, and significantly reduces doubt. Level of Evidence This is a Level III, prognostic study.

Keywords: classification; demographics; reproducibility; scaphoid fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scaphoid classification based on 3D imaging—proximal pole fractures, waist fractures, and distal avulsion fractures.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Herbert T J, Fisher W E. Management of the fractured scaphoid using a new bone screw. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1984;66(01):114–123. - PubMed
    1. Cooney W P, Dobyns J H, Linscheid R L. Fractures of the scaphoid: a rational approach to management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;(149):90–97. - PubMed
    1. Ten Berg P W, Drijkoningen T, Strackee S D, Buijze G A.Classifications ofacute scaphoid fractures: a systematic literature review J Wrist Surg 2016502152–159.. Doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571280 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buijze G A, Goslings J C, Rhemrev S J et al.Cast immobilization with and without immobilization of the thumb for nondisplaced and minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(04):621–627. - PubMed
    1. Siegel S CJ. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.