Physical stability of dry powder inhaler formulations
- PMID: 31815554
- PMCID: PMC6981243
- DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2020.1702643
Physical stability of dry powder inhaler formulations
Abstract
Introduction: Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are popular for pulmonary drug delivery. Various techniques have been employed to produce inhalation drug particles and improve the delivery efficiency of DPI formulations. Physical stability of these DPI formulations is critical to ensure the delivery of a reproducible dose to the airways over the shelf-life.Areas covered: This review focuses on the impact of solid-state stability on aerosolization performance of DPI drug particles manufactured by powder production approaches and particle-engineering techniques. It also highlights the different analytical tools that can be used to characterize the physical instability originating from production and storage.Expert opinion: A majority of the DPI literature focuses on the effects of physico-chemical properties such as size, morphology, and density on aerosolization. While little has been reported on the physical stability, particularly the stability of engineered drug particles for use in DPIs. Literature data have shown that different particle-engineering methods and storage conditions may cause physical instability of dry powders for inhalation and can significantly change the aerosol performance. A systematic examination of physical instability mechanisms in DPI formulations is necessary during formulation development in order to select the optimum formulation with satisfactory stability. In addition, the use of appropriate characterization tools is critical to detect and understand physical instability during the development of DPI formulations.
Keywords: Dry powder inhaler; aerosol performance; particle engineering; physical stability; powder characterization.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interest
N Shetty is an employee of Genentech. QT Zhou is funded by National Institute of Health, Center for Pharmaceutical Processing Research, Genentech, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. D Cipolla is an employee of Insmed. he authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
Figures
References
-
- Nokhodchi A, Martin GP. Pulmonary Drug Delivery: Advances and Challenges. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
-
- Anselmo AC, Gokarn Y, Mitragotri S. Non-invasive delivery strategies for biologics [Review Article]. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2018. 11/30/online;18:19. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.18310.1038/nrd.2018.183https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2018.183#supplementary-informationhttps://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2018.183#supplementary-information . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical