Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 7;9(12):361.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci9120361.

Role of MyD88 in IL-1β and Ethanol Modulation of GABAergic Transmission in the Central Amygdala

Affiliations

Role of MyD88 in IL-1β and Ethanol Modulation of GABAergic Transmission in the Central Amygdala

Michal Bajo et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88) is a critical neuroimmune adaptor protein in TLR (Toll-like receptor) and IL-1R (Interleukin-1 receptor) signaling complexes. These two pro-inflammatory families play an important role in the neurobiology of alcohol use disorder, specifically MyD88 regulates ethanol drinking, ethanol-induced sedation, and ethanol-induced deficits in motor coordination. In this study, we examined the role of MyD88 in mediating the effects of IL-1β and ethanol on GABAergic transmission in the central amygdala (CeA) of male mice using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in combination with pharmacological (AS-1, a mimetic that prevents MyD88 recruitment by IL-1R) and genetic (Myd88 knockout mice) approaches. We demonstrate through both approaches that IL-1β and ethanol's modulatory effects at CeA GABA synapses are not dependent on MyD88. Myd88 knockout potentiated IL-1β's actions in reducing postsynaptic GABAA receptor function. Pharmacological inhibition of MyD88 modulates IL-1β's action at CeA GABA synapses similar to Myd88 knockout mice. Additionally, ethanol-induced CeA GABA release was greater in Myd88 knockout mice compared to wildtype controls. Thus, MyD88 is not essential to IL-1β or ethanol regulation of CeA GABA synapses but plays a role in modulating the magnitude of their effects, which may be a potential mechanism by which it regulates ethanol-related behaviors.

Keywords: GABA; IL-1R1; Myd88 knockout; alcohol; interleukin-1; neuroimmune; sIPSC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Basal spontaneous GABAergic transmission is similar in the CeA of Myd88 KO and wildtype (WT) mice. (A) Representative traces of sIPSCs from WT and Myd88 KO mice. (BE) There were no significant differences in the basal sIPSC frequencies (B), amplitudes (C), rise times (D), and decay times (E) of CeA neurons from WT (n = 41 neurons) and Myd88 KO (n = 45 neurons) mice. The scattergrams represent values for each cell. Statistical significance was calculated by an unpaired t-test, and significance was set at p < 0.05.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MyD88 deletion dampens IL-1β’s effects on postsynaptic GABAA receptor function. (AB) IL-1β had dual effects on the sIPSC frequencies (A) and amplitudes (B) in both WT and KO mice. The scattergrams on the left show the normalized effects of IL-1β (50 ng/mL) in individual cells (WT: n = 13 cells; KO: n = 15 cells), and the right panels show the percentage of the CeA neurons responding to IL-1β with an increase, no change or decrease in the sIPSC frequencies and amplitudes. (C) Representative traces of CeA neurons responding to IL-1β with decreased sIPSC frequencies and amplitudes. (DE) While there were no differences in the predominant effect of IL-1β on the mean sIPSC frequency in WT (n = 11 cells) and KO (n = 13 cells) mice (D), Myd88 KO mice showed an IL-1β-induced decrease in the sIPSC amplitude (E). The statistical significance for the IL-1β effects was calculated by one-sample t-test (** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001), and for the comparison of the IL-1β effects between the WT and KO mice, an unpaired t-test was used (# p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effects of the MyD88 mimetic (AS-1) in WT mice. (AB) The scattergrams represent the responses of individual CeA cells to the acute application of the AS-1 (50 mM) and subsequent co-application of IL-1β, where panel A shows the effects of AS-1 on the sIPSC frequencies (WT: n = 7 cells), and panel B shows its effects on the sIPSC amplitude. (CD). In five out of six WT neurons pretreated with AS-1, there was an IL-1β-induced decrease in the mean sIPSC frequency, and the magnitude of this effect was not significantly different from the IL-1β-induced decrease in the Myd88 KO mice (data from Figure 2D). (D) IL-1β in the presence of AS-1 had no significant effects on the mean sIPSC amplitudes of WT cells, and the extent of this effect was not significantly different from the IL-1β’s effects in the Myd88 KO mice (data from Figure 2E). The statistical significance for the AS-1 and IL-1β effects was calculated by one-sample t-test (** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.0001), and for the comparison of the IL-1β’s effects between the WT, following AS-1 pretreatment, and KO mice, an unpaired t-test was used.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Facilitation of the presynaptic GABA release by 100 mM ethanol is more robust in Myd88 KO than in the WT mice. (A,B). Ethanol (44 mM) facilitated presynaptic GABA release across both genotypes, as represented by the increase in the mean sIPSC frequencies in 10 out of 14 neurons from WT and 7 out of 16 cells from KO mice. (C) Representative recordings of the CeA neurons responding to 44 mM ethanol with the increase in the sIPSC frequencies. (D) There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the ethanol-induced potentiation of the GABA release between the WT and KO mice. (E) Representative traces of the CeA neurons responsive to 100 mM ethanol. (F) The magnitude of the 100 mM ethanol-induced potentiation of the GABA release was significantly stronger in the KO mice (n = 4 out of 5 cells) compared to the WT mice (n = 5 out of 5 cells) mice. The statistical significance for the ethanol effects was calculated by one-sample t-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001), and an unpaired t-test (# p < 0.05) was used for the comparison of the magnitude of the ethanol effects between the WT and KO mice.

References

    1. Blanco A.M., Guerri C. Ethanol intake enhances inflammatory mediators in brain: Role of glial cells and TLR4/IL-1RI receptors. Front. Biosci. 2007;12:2616–2630. doi: 10.2741/2259. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCarthy G.M., Warden A.S., Bridges C.R., Blednov Y.A., Harris R.A. Chronic ethanol consumption: Role of TLR3/TRIF-dependent signaling. Addict. Biol. 2018;23:889–903. doi: 10.1111/adb.12539. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu J., Lewohl J.M., Harris R.A., Iyer V.R., Dodd P.R., Randall P.K., Mayfield R.D. Patterns of gene expression in the frontal cortex discriminate alcoholic from nonalcoholic individuals. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:1574–1582. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300947. - DOI - PubMed
    1. He J., Crews F.T. Increased MCP-1 and microglia in various regions of the human alcoholic brain. Exp. Neurol. 2008;210:349–358. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.11.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mulligan M.K., Ponomarev I., Hitzemann R.J., Belknap J.K., Tabakoff B., Harris R.A., Crabbe J.C., Blednov Y.A., Grahame N.J., Phillips T.J., et al. Toward understanding the genetics of alcohol drinking through transcriptome meta-analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:6368–6373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510188103. - DOI - PMC - PubMed