Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Dec 9;12(24):4113.
doi: 10.3390/ma12244113.

Biocompatibility of Root Canal Sealers: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Affiliations
Review

Biocompatibility of Root Canal Sealers: A Systematic Review of In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Diogo Afonso Fonseca et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

(1) Aim: To perform a systematic review of the literature on the biocompatibility of root canal sealers that encompasses the various types of sealers that are commercially available as well as both in vitro and in vivo evidence. (2) Methods: This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO (ID 140445) and was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Science Direct, and Web of Science Core Collection. Studies published between 2000 and 11 June 2019 that evaluated cytotoxicity (cell viability/proliferation) and biocompatibility (tissue response) of root canal sealers were included. (3) Results: From a total of 1249 studies, 73 in vitro and 21 in vivo studies were included. In general, studies suggest that root canal sealers elicit mild to severe toxic effects and that several factors may influence biocompatibility, e.g., material setting condition and time, material concentration, and type of exposure. Bioactive endodontic sealers seem to exhibit a lower toxic potential in vitro. (4) Conclusions: The available evidence shows that root canal sealers exhibit variable toxic potential at the cellular and tissue level. However, the methodological heterogeneity among studies included in this systematic review and the somewhat conflicting results do not allow a conclusion on which type of sealer presents higher biocompatibility. Further research is crucial to achieve a better understanding of the biological effects of root canal sealers.

Keywords: biocompatibility; cell death; endodontics; root canal filling materials; root canal sealer; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of identification of studies for inclusion in this systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methodological quality assessment of in vitro studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Methodological quality assessment of in vivo studies.

References

    1. Hargreaves K.M., Berman L.H. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. Elsevier; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2016.
    1. Johnson W., Kulild J.C., Tay F. Obturation of the Cleaned and Shaped Root Canal System. In: Hargreaves K.M., Berman L.H., editors. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. Elsevier; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2016. pp. 280–322.
    1. Grossman L. Endodontics. 11th ed. Lea & Febiger; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1988.
    1. Kishen A., Peters O.A., Zehnder M., Diogenes A.R., Nair M.K. Advances in endodontics: Potential applications in clinical practice. J. Conserv. Dent. 2016;19:199–206. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.181925. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ørstavik D. Materials used for root canal obturation: Technical, biological and clinical testing. Endod. Top. 2005;12:25–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00197.x. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources