Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021:263:127-146.
doi: 10.1007/164_2019_315.

The Use of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Spasticity

Affiliations

The Use of Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Spasticity

Sheng Li et al. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2021.

Erratum in

Abstract

Spasticity is one component of the upper motor neuron (UMN) syndrome resulting from a multitude of neurologic conditions, such as stroke, brain injury, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, and cerebral palsy. It is clinically recognized as a phenomenon of velocity-dependent increase in resistance, i.e., hypertonia. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of spasticity improve our understanding of mechanisms underlying this complex phenomenon and its relations to other components of UMN syndrome (weakness and disordered motor control), as well as the resultant clinical problems. This theoretical framework provides a foundation to set up treatment goals and to guide goal-oriented clinical assessment and treatment. Among a spectrum of treatment options, botulinum toxin (BoNT) therapy is the preferred treatment for focal spasticity. The evidence is very robust that BoNT therapy effectively reduces spasticity; however, it does not improve voluntary movement. In this chapter, we highlight a few issues on how to achieve the best clinical outcomes of BoNT therapy, such as dosing, dilution, guidance techniques, adjunctive therapies, early treatment, repeated injections, and central effects, as well as the ways to improve motor function in selected subgroups of patients with spasticity. We also discuss the reasons of poor responses to BoNT therapy and when not to use BoNT therapy.

Keywords: Botulinum toxin; Brain injury; Human; Motor recovery; Rehabilitation; Spasticity; Spinal cord injury; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albrecht P, Jansen A, Lee JI et al (2019) High prevalence of neutralizing antibodies after long-term botulinum neurotoxin therapy. Neurology 92:e48–e54 - PubMed
    1. Andringa A, van de Port I, van Wegen E, Ket J, Meskers C, Kwakkel G (2019) Effectiveness of botulinum toxin treatment for upper limb spasticity after stroke over different ICF domains: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 100:1703 - PubMed
    1. Baker R, Jasinski M, Maciag-Tymecka I et al (2002) Botulinum toxin treatment of spasticity in diplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:666–675 - PubMed
    1. Bakheit AMO, Thilmann AF, Ward AB, Poewe W, Wissel J, Muller J, Neumann C (2000) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study to compare the efficacy and safety of three doses of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) with placebo in upper limb spasticity after stroke. Stroke 31:2402–2406 - PubMed
    1. Barbero M, Merletti R, Rainoldi A (2012) Atlas of muscle innervation zones: understanding surface electromyography and its applications. Springer, Berlin