Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;51(1):43-53.
doi: 10.1159/000504869. Epub 2019 Dec 10.

Utility of Genomic Testing after Renal Biopsy

Affiliations

Utility of Genomic Testing after Renal Biopsy

Susan L Murray et al. Am J Nephrol. 2020.

Abstract

Background: Renal biopsy is the mainstay of renal pathological diagnosis. Despite sophisticated diagnostic techniques, it is not always possible to make a precise pathological diagnosis. Our aim was to identify a genetic cause of disease in patients who had undergone renal biopsy and determine if genetic testing altered diagnosis or treatment.

Methods: Patients with suspected familial kidney disease underwent a variety of next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategies. The subset of these patients who had also undergone native kidney biopsy was identified. Histological specimens were reviewed by a consultant pathologist, and genetic and pathological diagnoses were compared.

Results: Seventy-five patients in 47 families underwent genetic sequencing and renal biopsy. Patients were grouped into 5 diagnostic categories based on pathological diagnosis: tubulointerstitial kidney disease (TIKD; n = 18); glomerulonephritis (GN; n = 15); focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and Alport Syndrome (n = 11); thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA; n = 17); and nonspecific pathological changes (n = 14). Thirty-nine patients (52%) in 21 families (45%) received a genetic diagnosis; 13 cases (72%) with TIKD, 4 (27%) with GN, 6 (55%) with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis/Alport syndrome, and 10 (59%) with TMA and 6 cases (43%) with nonspecific features. Genetic testing resulted in changes in understanding of disease mechanism in 21 individuals (54%) in 12 families (57%). Treatment would have been altered in at least 26% of cases (10/39).

Conclusions: An accurate genetic diagnosis can result in changes in clinical diagnosis, understanding of pathological mechanism, and treatment. NGS should be considered as a complementary diagnostic technique to kidney biopsy in the evaluation of patients with kidney disease.

Keywords: Genetic polymorphism; Chronic kidney disease; Genetics; Pathology; Renal biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

None declared.

References

    1. Iversen P, Brun C. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Am J Med. 1951. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(51)90169-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kark RM, Muehrcke RC. BIOPSY OF KIDNEY IN PRONE POSITION. Lancet. 1954. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(54)91618-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int. 1999. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00299.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. Kidney Int. 2004. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00443.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tøndel C, Vikse BE, Bostad L, Svarstad E. Safety and complications of percutaneous kidney biopsies in 715 children and 8573 adults in Norway 1988–2010. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012. doi:10.2215/CJN.02150212 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types