Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 10;3(4):bjgpopen19X101666.
doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen19X101666. Online ahead of print.

Patient decision aids for antidepressant use in pregnancy: a pilot randomised controlled trial in the UK

Affiliations

Patient decision aids for antidepressant use in pregnancy: a pilot randomised controlled trial in the UK

Hind Khalifeh et al. BJGP Open. .

Abstract

Background: Decision-making regarding antidepressant use in pregnancy is challenging, given the uncertain evidence base on the benefits and risks for women and their children. Patient decision aids (PDAs) can improve shared decision-making for complex health decisions but no evidence-based PDAs exist for antidepressant use in pregnancy.

Aim: To assess the feasibility of a full-scale randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of an electronic PDA on antidepressant use in pregnancy.

Design & setting: A UK-based pilot parallel-group RCT.

Method: The study recruited women whose clinicians recommended an antidepressant for depression in a current or planned pregnancy, and who were uncertain about antidepressant use while pregnant. Women were recruited via clinician or self-referral, and randomised to online access to the PDA or online access to standard resource list, with primary follow-up at 4 weeks and longer-term follow-up. The primary outcome was protocol feasibility (recruitment target of 50 women and follow-up rate of 80%). Outcome measures for a future full-scale RCT included the decisional conflict scale (DCS).

Results: Fifty-one women were recruited with a follow-up rate of 90.2% at 4 weeks. The PDA received good overall satisfaction ratings (mean 4.2/5). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) indicated a small improvement in decisional conflict at 4 weeks, accounting for baseline scores (DCS regression coefficient = -3.5, 95% confidence intervals [CI = -12.6 to 5.6]).

Conclusion: This pilot RCT for an electronic PDA on antidepressant use in pregnancy showed that the study protocol was feasible, with high rates of participant satisfaction among those randomised to the PDA.

Keywords: antidepressants; depression; patient decision aid; pilot; pregnancy; randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant flow diagram
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Responses to acceptability questionnaire among women who were randomised to receive the patient decision aid (PDA)

References

    1. Howard LM, Molyneaux E, Dennis C-L, et al. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1775–1788. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61276-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, et al. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1800–1819. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61277-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance. Clinical guideline [CG192] https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg192. 2014 19 Nov 2019. - PubMed
    1. Jimenez-Solem E, Andersen JT, Petersen M, et al. Prevalence of antidepressant use during pregnancy in Denmark, a nation-wide cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e63034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063034. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pearson RM, Carnegie RE, Cree C, et al. Prevalence of prenatal depression symptoms among 2 generations of pregnant mothers: the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(3):e180725. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources