Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 10;18(1):193.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1095-y.

Households forgoing healthcare as a measure of financial risk protection: an application to Liberia

Affiliations

Households forgoing healthcare as a measure of financial risk protection: an application to Liberia

Jacopo Gabani et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Introduction: Access to Liberia's health system is reliant on out-of-pocket (OOP) health expenditures which may prevent people from seeking care or result in catastrophic health expenditure (CHE). CHE and impoverishment due to OOP, which are used by the World Bank and World Health Organization as the sole measures of financial risk protection, are limited: they do not consider households who, following a health shock, do not incur expenditure because they cannot access the healthcare services they need (i.e., households forgoing healthcare (HFH) services). This paper attempts to overcome this limitation and improve financial risk protection by measuring HFH incidence and comparing it with CHE standard measures using household survey data from Liberia.

Methods: Data from the Liberia Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2014 were analysed. An OOP health expenditure is catastrophic when it exceeds a total or non-food household expenditure threshold. A CHE incidence curve, representing CHE incidence at different thresholds, was developed. To overcome CHE limitations, an HFH incidence measure was developed based on CHE, OOP and health shocks data: households incurring health shocks and having negligible OOP were considered to have forgone healthcare. HFH incidence was compared with standard CHE measures.

Results: CHE incidence and intensity levels depend on the threshold used. Using a 30% non-food expenditure threshold, CHE incidence is 2.1% (95% CI: 1.7-2.5%) and CHE intensity is 37.4% (95% CI: 22.7-52.0%). CHE incidence is approximately in line with other countries, while CHE intensity is higher than in other countries. CHE pushed 1.6% of households below the food poverty line in 2014. c approximately 4 times higher than CHE (8.0, 95% CI, 7.2-8.9%).

Conclusion: Lack of financial risk protection is a significant problem in Liberia and it may be underestimated by CHE: this study confirms that HFH incidence can complement CHE measures in providing a complete picture of financial risk protection and demonstrates a simple method that includes measures of healthcare forgone as part of standard CHE analyses. This paper provides a new methodology to measure HFH incidence and highlights the need to consider healthcare forgone in analyses of financial risk protection, as well as the need for further development of these measures.

Keywords: Catastrophic health expenditure; Equity; Financial risk protection; Forgoing healthcare; Health financing; Impoverishment; Liberia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Average Catastrophic Health Expenditure (CHE) of countries depending on their income groups. Source: author elaboration based on “Tracking UHC, Global Monitoring Report” [32] and World Bank Country and Lending Groups [38]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Catastrophic Health Expenditure (CHE) incidence depending on different expenditure thresholds
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Households forgoing health services (HFH) incidence sensitivity analysis. *The HFH incidence curve has been considering “households that did not incur CHE as 10% of total expenditure”. At the 10US$ threshold, HFH incidence is the same regardless of the CHE definition (i.e. HFH incidence is the same when “not incurred CHE” is intended as not incurred CHE at 10% or 25% of total expenditure, as well as 30% or 40% of non-food expenditure)

References

    1. Abiiro GA, De Allegri M. Universal health coverage from multiple perspectives: a synthesis of conceptual literature and global debates. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015;15(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12914-015-0056-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagstaff A. The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Economics. 2005;14(4):429–432. doi: 10.1002/hec.953. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akazili J, et al. Assessing the catastrophic effects of out-of-pocket healthcare payments prior to the uptake of a nationwide health insurance scheme in Ghana. Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1289735. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1289735. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baggio Stéphanie, Dupuis Marc, Richard Jean-Baptiste, Beck François. Addictive behaviors and healthcare renunciation for economic reasons in a French population-based sample. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2017;49:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boerma Ties, Eozenou Patrick, Evans David, Evans Tim, Kieny Marie-Paule, Wagstaff Adam. Monitoring Progress towards Universal Health Coverage at Country and Global Levels. PLoS Medicine. 2014;11(9):e1001731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001731. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources