Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917228.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17228.

Trends in Prescription Analgesic Use Among Adults With Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States, 1999-2016

Affiliations
Observational Study

Trends in Prescription Analgesic Use Among Adults With Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States, 1999-2016

Andrew Stokes et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Monitoring trends in prescription analgesic use among adults with musculoskeletal conditions provides insight into how changing prescribing practices, guidelines, and policy measures may affect those who need pain management.

Objective: To evaluate trends in prescription opioid use and nonopioid analgesic use among adults with functional limitations attributable to musculoskeletal conditions.

Design, setting, and participants: This repeated cross-sectional study uses data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study from 1999 to 2016. Data were analyzed from January to July 2019. The participants were adults aged 30 to 79 years who reported functional limitations due to back or neck problems and/or arthritis or rheumatism.

Main outcomes and measures: Any use of a prescription opioid or exclusive use of a prescription nonopioid analgesic.

Results: In this population of 7256 adults with 1 or more functional limitations attributable to a musculoskeletal condition (4226 women [59.9%]; 3508 [74.4%] non-Hispanic white individuals; median [interquartile range] age, 63 [53-70] years), opioid use and exclusive nonopioid analgesic use exhibited approximately reciprocal patterns of change from 1999 to 2016. Opioid use increased significantly (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 1999-2000, 7.2%; 95% CI, 1.3% to 13%; P for trend = .002), and exclusive use of nonopioid analgesics decreased significantly (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 1999-2000, -13%; 95% CI, -19% to -7.5%; P for trend < .001) during this period. The increase in any opioid use was driven by long-term rather than short-term use. A crossover in the prevalence of opioid use and exclusive use of nonopioid analgesics occurred between 2003 and 2006, after which opioid use was more prevalent. Between 2013 and 2016, decreases in opioid use were observed among men (difference in prevalence for 2015-2016 vs 2013-2014, -11%; 95% CI, -21% to 1.8%) and participants with less than a high school education (difference, -15%; 95% CI, -24% to -6.1%). During this same period, exclusive nonopioid analgesic use also decreased markedly across the population (difference, -5.3%; 95% CI, -9.1% to -1.5%).

Conclusions and relevance: The substitution of opioids for nonopioid analgesics between 2003 and 2006 may have occurred as evidence emerged on the cardiovascular risks associated with nonopioid analgesics. Reductions in opioid use between 2013 and 2016 were most substantial among those with low socioeconomic status, who may encounter barriers in accessing alternatives. Despite those decreases, opioid use remained more prevalent in 2015 to 2016 than in 1999 to 2000, suggesting a potentially long tail for the opioid epidemic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Stokes reported receiving research funding from Ethicon Endo-Surgery outside of the submitted work. Dr Neogi reported receiving personal fees from Pfizer and Regeneron. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Prevalence of Prescription Opioid and Nonopioid Analgesic Use, 1999 to 2016
Prescription opioid and nonopioid analgesic use exhibited approximately reciprocal patterns of change over the 18-year study period, comparing 1999 to 2000 with 2015 to 2016. Error bars denote 95% CIs.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Prevalence of Long-term, Short-term, and Any Opioid Use, 1999 to 2016
The trends in opioid use between 1999 to 2000 and 2015 to 2016 reflected long-term rather than short-term use of opioids. Error bars denote 95% CIs.

References

    1. Briggs AM, Woolf AD, Dreinhöfer K, et al. Reducing the global burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(5):-. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.204891 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dieleman JL, Baral R, Birger M, et al. US spending on personal health care and public health, 1996-2013. JAMA. 2016;316(24):2627-2646. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16885 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mokdad AH, Ballestros K, Echko M, et al. ; US Burden of Disease Collaborators . The state of US health, 1990-2016: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors among US states. JAMA. 2018;319(14):1444-1472. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0158 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dasgupta N, Beletsky L, Ciccarone D. Opioid crisis: no easy fix to its social and economic determinants. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(2):182-186. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304187 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hadland SE, Cerdá M, Li Y, Krieger MS, Marshall BDL. Association of pharmaceutical industry marketing of opioid products to physicians with subsequent opioid prescribing. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(6):861-863. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1999 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types