Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 3:18:62.
doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0383-6. eCollection 2019.

Benchmarking nurse outcomes in Australian Magnet® hospitals: cross-sectional survey

Affiliations

Benchmarking nurse outcomes in Australian Magnet® hospitals: cross-sectional survey

L Stone et al. BMC Nurs. .

Abstract

Background: Positive reports of nursing-related outcomes such as quality nursing care, nursing engagement with work and good practice environment are crucial in attaining and maintaining Magnet® designation. The majority of Magnet®-designated organisations (N = 482) are in the USA, with their aggregate nursing outcomes widely published as benchmark data. Australian Magnet® outcomes have not been aggregated or published to date.

Methods: The aims are to benchmark educational preparation, occupational burnout, job satisfaction, intention to leave and working environment of nurses in Australian Magnet®-designated facilities and to determine the reliability of the Practice Environment Scale-Australia.The design is a cross-sectional multisite survey set in all three Australian Magnet®-designated organisations.The demographics included age, gender, level of education, years in practice, level of seniority and position title. Two items measured job satisfaction and intent to stay in current employment. The Maslach Burnout Inventory explored the three domains of nursing engagement: depersonalisation, personal achievement and emotional exhaustion. The Australian version of the Practice Environment Scale interrogated participants' perceptions of their work environments.

Results: 2004 nurses participated (response rate 45.9%). Respondents' mean age was 39.2 years (range 20-72). They were predominantly female and had worked in their current facility for more than 5 years. Eighty five percent had a minimum of a Bachelor's degree. Eighty-six percent of respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with their current position. Eighty eight percent had no intention of leaving their current employer within the next 12 months. Participants rated their hospitals highly in all domains of the practice environment. Respondents reported less burnout in the personal accomplishment and depersonalisation domains than in the emotional exhaustion domain, in which they reported average levels of burnout. The internal consistency of the Practice Environment Scale-Australia was confirmed in this sample (Cronbach α's 0.87-0.9 for subscales and 0.89 for composite score).

Conclusion: In this paper, we present nursing outcome data from all Australian Magnet® hospitals for the first time. This provides a benchmark that facilitates comparison with nursing outcomes published by Australian non-Magnet® hospitals and with international Magnet® organisations.

Keywords: Burnout; Job satisfaction; Magnet®; Nursing outcomes; Practice environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Categorisation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey (MBIHSS)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Association of PES-AUS scores. * Logistic regression adjusted for hospital site, age, gender and nursing grade. ** An odds ratio of 1 represents no effect, indicated here with a blue dashed line. *** Scores were with: job dissatisfaction, intent to leave, high emotional exhaustion, high depersonalisation and low personal accomplishment

References

    1. American Nurses Credentialing Center . Magnet Recognition Program. ANCC 2019. 2018.
    1. Kutney-Lee A, Stimpfel AW, Sloane DM, Cimiotti JP, Quinn LW, Aiken LH. Changes in patient and nurse outcomes associated with magnet hospital recognition. Med Care. 2015;53:550–557. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000355. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kelly LA, McHugh MD, Aiken LH. Nurse outcomes in magnet(R) and non-magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2012;42:S44–S49. doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000420394.18284.4f. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swiger PA, Patrician PA, Miltner RSS, Raju D, Breckenridge-Sproat S, Loan LA. The practice environment scale of the nursing work index: an updated review and recommendations for use. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;74:76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.06.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kutney-Lee A, Lake ET, Aiken LH. Development of the hospital nurse surveillance capacity profile. Res Nurs Health. 2009;32:217–228. doi: 10.1002/nur.20316. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources