An institution-wide faculty mentoring program at an academic health center with 6-year prospective outcome data
- PMID: 31827904
- PMCID: PMC6885994
- DOI: 10.1017/cts.2019.412
An institution-wide faculty mentoring program at an academic health center with 6-year prospective outcome data
Erratum in
-
An institution-wide faculty mentoring program at an academic health center with 6-year prospective outcome data - ADDENDUM.J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 31;4(4):370. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.4. J Clin Transl Sci. 2020. PMID: 33244421 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: There is discontent and turnover among faculty at US academic health centers because of the challenges in balancing clinical, research, teaching, and work-life responsibilities in the current healthcare environment. One potential strategy to improve faculty satisfaction and limit turnover is through faculty mentoring programs.
Methods: A Mentor Leadership Council was formed to design and implement an institution-wide faculty mentoring program across all colleges at an academic health center. The authors conducted an experimental study of the impact of the mentoring program using pre-intervention (2011) and 6-year (2017) post-intervention faculty surveys that measured the long-term effectiveness of the program.
Results: The percent of faculty who responded to the surveys was 45.9% (656/1428) in 2011 and 40.2% (706/1756) in 2017. For faculty below the rank of full professor, percent of faculty with a mentor (45.3% vs. 67.1%, P < 0.001), familiarity with promotion criteria (81.7% vs. 90.0%, P = 0.001), and satisfaction with department's support of career (75.6% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.002) improved. The percent of full professors serving as mentors also increased from 50.3% in 2011 to 68.0% in 2017 (P = 0.002). However, the percent of non-retiring faculty considering leaving the institution over the next 2 years increased from 18.8% in 2011 to 24.3% in 2017 (P = 0.02).
Conclusions: Implementation of an institution-wide faculty mentoring program significantly improved metrics of career development and faculty satisfaction but was not associated with a reduction in the percent of faculty considering leaving the institution. This suggests the need for additional efforts to identify and limit factors driving faculty turnover.
Keywords: Faculty mentoring; career development; career satisfaction; faculty turnover.
© The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2019.
Figures
References
-
- Konstam MA, et al. Academic Cardiology Section Leadership Council of the American College of Cardiology. The academic medical system: reinvention to survive the revolution in health care. The Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017; 69(10): 1305–1312. - PubMed
-
- Agana DF, et al. Job satisfaction among academic family physicians. Family Medicine 2017; 49(8): 622–625. - PubMed
-
- Desselle SP, et al. The scholarly productivity and work environments of academic pharmacists. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy 2018; 14(8): 727–735. - PubMed
-
- Stoykov ME, et al. Junior investigators thinking about quitting research: a survey. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy: Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 2017; 71(2): 7102280010p1–7102280010p7. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources