Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):1665.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7978-4.

Lessons learned from engaging communities for Ebola vaccine trials in Sierra Leone: reciprocity, relatability, relationships and respect (the four R's)

Sara Dada  1   2 , Gillian McKay  3 , Ana Mateus  4 , Shelley Lees  3
Affiliations

Lessons learned from engaging communities for Ebola vaccine trials in Sierra Leone: reciprocity, relatability, relationships and respect (the four R's)

Sara Dada et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Building trust and engaging the community are important for biomedical trials. This was core to the set up and delivery of the EBOVAC-Salone and PREVAC Ebola vaccine trials in Sierra Leone during and following the 2014-2016 West African Ebola epidemic. Local community liaison teams (CLT) engaged with the community through public meetings, radio chat shows, and other activities, while a social science team (SST) assessed community members' and participants' perceptions and regularly updated the clinical team to adapt procedures to improve the acceptability and compliance of the trial. The objective of this study was to examine the community engagement (CE) program in these trials and to identify potential barriers and facilitators.

Methods: Fifteen CLT and SST members participated in in-depth interviews and 23 community members attended three focus groups to discuss the Ebola vaccine trials and their experiences and perspectives of the CE activities.

Results: A key aim of the CE program was to build trust between the community and the trial. Four main principles (the "four R's") evolved from the discussions with team members and the community that influenced this trust: reciprocity, relatability, relationships and respect. The CLT and SST ensured reciprocal communication between the trial team and the community. The CLT delivered key messages from the trial, whilst the SST completed ethnographic research in the field to uncover rumors and perceptions of the trial in the community. These ethnographic findings were shared with the CLT and addressed in targeted messaging to the community. Both the CLT and SST approached the communities in an egalitarian manner, by dressing modestly, speaking local dialects, and using relatable examples. Appreciation and understanding of the importance of interpersonal relationships and respect for the people, their customs, and traditions also played a large role in the CE program.

Conclusion: These findings provide an in-depth understanding of how interdisciplinary community liaison and social science teams can work with a clinical team to strengthen trust. The four R's suggest the ways in which trust relations are central to CE and confidence in vaccine trials, and could offer an approach to CE in vaccine trials.

Keywords: Community engagement; Disease preparedness; Ebola; Sierra Leone; Vaccine trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Community Engagement Structure . The trial’s community engagement structure, highlighting the interactions between the different parties. Source: EBOVAC trial community engagement diagram – Tom Mooney
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
“Bridges of Information”. The flow of information in the community engagement program of the vaccine trial based on descriptions from interview participants
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Wilkinson A, Parker M, Martineau F, Leach M. Engaging ‘communities’: anthropological insights from the west African Ebola epidemic. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2017;372(1721):20160305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0305. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed SM, Palermo A-GS. Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1380–1387. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickert N, Sugarman J. Ethical goals of community consultation in research. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(7):1123–1127. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.058933. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aggett S. Turning the gaze: challenges of involving biomedical researchers in community engagement with research in Patan, Nepal. Crit Public Health. 2018;28(3):306–317. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2018.1443203. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacQueen KM, Bhan A, Frohlich J, Holzer J. Sugarman J, the ethics working group of the HIVPTN. Eval Community Engage Global Health Res. 2015;16:44. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms